Wednesday, 31 August 2011

Buddhism: Buddhism and Barriers

Buddhism
Get the latest headlines from the Buddhism GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Buddhism and Barriers
Aug 31st 2011, 14:11

Arun at Angry Asian Buddhism has published a lovely essay by Alan Senauke called "Race and Buddhism" that I encourage you to go and read. I just want to add a few observations.

The essay is written from the perspective of a Zen student, mostly about American Zen, which stubbornly remains overwhelmingly white. As I pointed out in a recent blog post on working-class Buddhism, Nichiren Buddhism in America does not seem to have that problem. I say "seem" because I have no recent data to go by, but it's my understanding that at least 20 percent of Soka Gakkai membership in the U.S. is African American.

Now, assuming this is true, why would African Americans feel more at home with Nichiren practice than with Zen, Theravada, or Tibetan Buddhism? And the first thing that pops into my head is that the meditative schools of Buddhism require an ability to arrange one's time to do the meditation and the retreats, and this probably is easier for upper-income professionals than for people working for an hourly wage.

It may be that money is a factor as well, since the meditative schools usually require, at minimum, a meditation hall to be rented or purchased and a teacher or lama in attendance. In some cases students are struggling to pay mortgages on entire monasteries. The�perpetual fundraising and the dues or fees we are often asked to fork over can be a real barrier.

However, Clark Strand wrote in "Born in the USA: Racial Diversity in Soka Gakkai International" that these are not the real reasons for the racial disparity. "Many of today's African American SGI members have careers that afford them the time and money to attend a Zen retreat, if they want to," he writes.

The difference, Strand writes, is twofold. One, SGI, which began as an educational reform movement in Japan, in particular puts a strong emphasis on self-empowerment and societal reform. "For it is the disenfranchised in a society who are most likely to seek to reform it, the disenfranchised as well who are most likely to understand that self-empowerment is the only effective plan."

Second, Strand says,

"For all the Asian-Buddhist flavor of lighting incense, sitting on zafus, or chanting in Tibetan or Japanese, these traditions are in reality dominated by a white culture that is virtually invisible to its own members, who as representatives of the dominant culture have limited awareness of race issues and little real incentive for addressing them. ...

"... When African Americans step into a Buddhist meditation center, that invisible culture is the first thing they see. They may be strong enough to participate in it without losing heart, or their racial identity, or both. Or they may be so strongly motivated to practice in that particular tradition that it just doesn't matter. In any event, they won't be kicked out for being black, because there are few outright bigots in the white Buddhist world. But the deeper racism, the passive racism committed to all the mannered nuances of its own culture--that is felt right away. No wonder most African Americans never make it through the door. There's no sign saying they can't come in. There doesn't have to be."

I do appreciate how the mannered nuances create discomfort. On the other hand, Strand is saying here that African Americans feel all those mannered nuances before they even set foot in the Zen center, which suggests to me there is something else going on beside the mannered nuances.

I'm not denying that white Zen students can be insensitive to the experiences of people of color. Once in my current Zen center, in a group discussion about anger, an African American woman described the anger she feels when dealing with racists. And lo, a white guy in the group actually spoke up and advised her how she was supposed to deal with this anger, like he had any idea what she had experienced. (And if you're reading this, fella, you know who you are.)

I was sorely tempted to jump out of my chair and smack him with a sutra book, but I am way too repressed. And I assume there are rules about sutra books that prohibit using them to smack people. However, at the first opportunity I let the woman know that the guy was being a jerk and deserved to be smacked, even if I lacked the courage to do it myself. I hope that helped; it felt a bit inadequate.

But it's also the case that Zen centers and monasteries are intimidating to just about everybody at first. I know I was scared to death of the Zen Mountain Monastery zendo the first few times I walked into it, back in the 1980s.� The monks were very stern about proper zendo etiquette. I was terrified I was going to do something wrong, like bow at the wrong time. It was not a cuddly, welcoming sort of place; you had to really want to be there.

So if the issue is that people of color are really tired of going places where they feel out of place and unwelcome, and they'd rather avoid it in their spiritual lives, that's very understandable. But if that's the case, I don't see that changing in Zen, anyway, anytime soon. And this is as much about the nature of Zen as the nature of clueless white people.

My current urban Zen center is about as warm and welcoming as Zen gets, and even then I occasionally notice people -- white ones, even -- who are clearly freaked out by the place. It takes some getting used to.

It's also the case that women were made to feel unwelcome in some of the early U.S. Zen centers, or at least this has been reported back to me. I can't say that I've experienced this myself, but over the years I've heard horror stories about sexism from my elder Zen student sisters. I think this is much less of an issue now, especially since a big percentage of American zen teachers are women these days.

Well, so far I've gone on and on and not actually said anything about Alan Senauke's essay. I think I will save that for the next post.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Mahayana Sutras

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Mahayana Sutras
Aug 31st 2011, 10:01

The name sutra (Sanskrit for "thread") in Buddhism originally was given only to the sermons of the historical Buddha, as recognized by the First Buddhist Council (ca. 460 BCE). The works listed below probably were written between 100 BCE and 300 CE. The authors are unknown. Whatever their origin, they are considered to be sutras by Mahayana Buddhism.

The Brahma Net (Brahmajala) Sutra

The Brahma Net is a discourse on discipline and morality. In particular, it contains the Ten Grand Precepts. This Brahmajala Sutra should not be confused with the Brahmajala Sutta of the Tripitaka.

The Flower Garland (Avatamsaka or Buddhavatamsaka) Sutra

The Flower Garland Sutra, sometimes called the Flower Ornament Sutra, is a collection of smaller sutras that emphasize the interpenetration of all things. That is, all things and all beings not only reflect all other things and beings but also the Absolute in its totality. The Flower Garland is particularly important to the Hua-yen (Kegon) and Ch'an (Zen) schools.

The Heroic Gate (Shurangama) Sutra

Also called "The Sutra of the Heroic One," the Shurangama (also spelled Suramgama or Surangama) stresses the importance of samadhi to the realization of enlightenment. The sutra also describes 25 gates to realization of one's true nature.

The Jewel Heap (Ratnakuta) Sutra

One of the oldest of the Mahayana Sutras, the Jewel Heap discusses the Middle Way. It provided a basis for the Madhyamaka teachings of Nagarjuna.

The Lankavatara Sutra

Lankavatara means "entering into Sri Lanka." This sutra describes the Buddha answering questions at an assembly. He expounds upon the "mind only" doctrine, which teaches that individual things exist only as processes of knowing. Put another way, our minds perceive reality in terms of an observer (us) and distinctive things observed. But the sutra says that distinctive things have no identity outside of this perception.

This sutra also says that words are not necessary for the transmission of the dharma, a teaching particularly important to the Ch'an (Zen) school.

The Lotus (Saddharma Pundarika) Sutra

The Lotus Sutra is one of the most well-known and venerated of the Mahayana Sutras. It is particularly important to the T'ien-t'ai (Tendai) and Nichiren schools, but it is revered by several other schools of Mahayana.

The Mahaparinirvana Sutra

The Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra is a collection of sutras said to have been delivered by the Buddha the night before his death. The sutras are primarily about the doctrine of Buddha-nature. The Mahayana Mahaparinirvana Sutra should not be confused with the Mahaparinibanna-sutra of the Pali Canon.

The Perfection of Wisdom (Prajnaparamita) Sutra

The Perfection of Wisdom Sutra is a vast collection of about 40 sutras. Of these, the best known in the West are the Heart Sutra (Mahaprajnaparamita-hridaya-sutra) and the Diamond (or Diamond Cutter) Sutra (Vajracchedika-sutra). These two brief texts are among the most important of the Mahayana sutras, especially in the Ch'an (Zen) school. They point in particular to the doctrine of shunyata ("emptiness").

The Pure Land Sutras

Three sutras--the Amitabha; the Amitayurdhyana, also called the Sutra of Infinite Life; and the Aparimitayur -- provide the doctrinal basis of the Pure Land school. The Amitabha and Aparimitayur are sometimes also called the shorter and longer Sukhavati-vyuha or Sukhavati Sutras.

Very briefly, The Amitabha Sutra describes the practice of reciting the name of Amitabha Buddha. The Amitayurdhyana describes rebirth in the Pure Land; and the Aparimitayur tells the story of .

The Vimalakirti Sutra

In this sutra, the layman Vimalakirti expounds upon nonduality to a host of high-ranking bodhisattvas. Vimalakirti exemplifies the bodhisattva ideal and reveals that enlightenment is available to anyone, layperson or monastic.

For more on this beloved sutra, see Dharma talks by John Daido Loori and Liu King-pong.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddhist and Abortion

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Buddhist and Abortion
Aug 31st 2011, 10:01

(This is the second part of an essay on Buddhist Views of Abortion. Click "Continued from Page 1" to read the first part.)

The Buddhist Approach to Morality

Buddhism does not approach morality by handing out absolute rules to be followed in all circumstances. Instead, it provides guidance to help us see how what we do affects ourselves and others. The karma we create with our thoughts, words and actions keeps us subject to cause and effect. Thus, we assume responsibility for our actions and the results of our actions. Even the Precepts are not commandments, but princples, and it is up to us to decide how to apply those principles to our lives.

Karma Lekshe Tsomo, a professor of theology and a nun in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, explains,

"There are no moral absolutes in Buddhism and it is recognized that ethical decision-making involves a complex nexus of causes and conditions. 'Buddhism' encompasses a wide spectrum of beliefs and practices, and the canonical scriptures leave room for a range of interpretations. All of these are grounded in a theory of intentionality, and individuals are encouraged to analyze issues carefully for themselves. ... When making moral choices, individuals are advised to examine their motivation--whether aversion, attachment, ignorance, wisdom, or compassion--and to weigh the consequences of their actions in light of the Buddha's teachings."

What's Wrong With Moral Absolutes?

Our culture places great value on something called "moral clarity." Moral clarity rarely is defined, but I infer it means ignoring the messier aspects of complex moral issues so that one can apply simple, rigid rules to solving them. If you take all facets of an issue into account, you risk not being clear.

Moral clarifiers love to rework all ethical problems into simple equations of right and wrong, good and bad. There is an assumption that an issue can have only two sides, and that one side must be entirely right and the other side entirely wrong. Complex issues are simplified and oversimplified and stripped of all ambiguous aspects to make them fit into "right" and "wrong" boxes.

To a Buddhist, this is a dishonest and unskillful way to approach morality.

In the case of abortion, often people who have taken a side glibly dismiss the concerns of any other side. For example, in much anti-abortion literature women who have abortions are portrayed as selfish or thoughtless, or sometimes just plain evil. The very real problems an unwanted pregnancy might bring to a woman's life are not honestly acknowledged. Moralists sometimes discuss embryos, pregnancy and abortion without mentioning women at all. At the same time, those who favor legal abortion sometimes fail to acknowledge the humanity of the fetus.

The Fruits of Absolutism

Although Buddhism discourages abortion, we see that criminalizing abortion causes much suffering. The Alan Guttmacher Institute documents that criminalizing abortion does not stop it or even reduce it. Instead, abortion goes underground and is performed in unsafe conditions.

In desperation, women submit to unsterile procedures. They drink bleach or turpentine, perforate themselves with sticks and coat hangers, and even jump off roofs. Worldwide, unsafe abortion procedures cause the deaths of about 67,000 women per year, mostly in nations in which abortion is illegal.

Those with "moral clarity" can ignore this suffering. A Buddhist cannot. In his book The Mind of Clover: Essays in Zen Buddhist Ethics, Robert Aitken Roshi said (p.17), "The absolute position, when isolated, omits human details completely. Doctrines, including Buddhism, are meant to be used. Beware of them taking life of their own, for then they use us."

What About the Baby?

My understanding is that an individual is a phenomenon of life in the same way a wave is a phenomenon of ocean. When the wave begins, nothing is added to the ocean; when it ends, nothing is taken away.

Robert Aitken Roshi wrote (The Mind of Clover, pp. 21-22),

"Sorrow and suffering form the nature of samsara, the flow of life and death, and the decision to prevent birth is made on balance with other elements of suffering. Once the decision is made, there is no blame, but rather acknowledgment that sadness pervades the whole universe, and this bit of life goes with our deepest love."

The Buddhist Approach

In researching this article I found universal consensus among Buddhist ethicists that the best approach to the abortion issue is to educate people about birth control and encourage them to use contraceptives. Beyond that, as Karma Lekshe Tsomo writes,

"In the end, most Buddhists recognize the incongruity that exists between ethical theory and actual practice and, while they do not condone the taking of life, do advocate understanding and compassion toward all living beings, a lovingkindness that is nonjudgmental and respects the right and freedom of human beings to make their own choices."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Tuesday, 30 August 2011

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The Wheel of Life: The Realm of Asuras

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Wheel of Life: The Realm of Asuras
Aug 30th 2011, 10:01

Asuras are hyper-competitive and paranoid. They are driven by a desire to beat their competition, and everyone is competition. They have power and resources and sometimes accomplish good things with them. But, always, their first priority is getting to the top. I think of powerful politicians or corporate leaders when I think of Asuras.

Chih-i (538-597), a patriarch of the T'ien-t'ai school, described the Asura this way: "Always desiring to be superior to others, having no patience for inferiors and belittling strangers; like a hawk, flying high above and looking down on others, and yet outwardly displaying justice, worship, wisdom, and faith -- this is raising up the lowest order of good and walking the way of the Asuras."

For some reason, the Asuras, who are also called "anti-gods," are perpetually at war with the Devas of the God Realm. Here we see they have formed a line of defense and are fighting the attacking Devas with bows and arrows. Some depictions of the Wheel of Life combine the Asura and God realms into one.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The Wheel of Life: The Center

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Wheel of Life: The Center
Aug 30th 2011, 10:01

At the center of every Wheel of Life are a cock, a snake and a pig, which represent greed, anger and ignorance. In Buddhism, greed, anger (or hate) and ignorance are called the "Three Poisons" because they poison whoever harbors them. These are the forces that keep the Wheel of Life turning, according to the Buddha's teaching of the Second Noble Truth.

The circle outside the center, which is sometimes missing in depictions of the Wheel, is called the Sidpa Bardo, or intermediate state. It is also sometimes called the White Path and the Dark Path. On one side, bodhisattvas guide beings to rebirths in the higher realms of Devas, Gods and Humans. On the other, demons lead beings to the lower realms of Hungry Ghosts, Hell Beings and Animals.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Vajra

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Vajra
Aug 30th 2011, 10:01

Definition:

When used in Buddhist literature, the Sanskrit word vajra usually is defined "diamond" or "adamantine." It can also mean "thunderbolt," although this definition of vajra is more often associated with Hinduism.

A diamond is spotlessly pure and indestructible. As such, the word vajra sometimes signifies enlightenment, or the absolute reality of shunyata, "emptiness."

The vajra also is ritual object associated with Tibetan Buddhism, also called by its Tibetan name, dorje. These objects usually are made of bronze, vary in size and have three, five or nine spokes that usually close at each end in lotus shape. The number of spokes and the way they come together, or not, at the ends have numerous symbolic meanings.

In Tibetan ritual, the vajra often is used together with a bell. The vajra is held in the left hand and represents the male principle, upaya, action or means. The bell is held in the right hand and represents the female principle, prajna, wisdom.

A double dorje, or vishvavajra, are two dorjes connected to form a cross. A double dorje represents the foundation of the physical world and is also associated with certain tantric deities.

Also Known As: Dorje (Tibetan)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Pure Land Buddhism

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Pure Land Buddhism
Aug 30th 2011, 10:01

Origins of Pure Land Buddhism

Mount Lushan, in southeast China, is celebrated for the soft mists that blanket its sheer peaks and deep forest valleys. This scenic area is also a world cultural site. Since ancient times many spiritual and educational centers have been located there. Among these is the birthplace of Pure Land Buddhism.

In 402 CE the monk and teacher Hui-yuan (336-416) gathered 123 followers in a monastery he had built on the slopes of Mount Lushan. This group, called the White Lotus Society, vowed before an image of Amitabha Buddha that they would be reborn in the Western Paradise.

In the centuries to follow, Pure Land Buddhism would spread throughout China.

The Western Paradise

Sukhavati, the Pure Land of the West, is discussed in the Amitabha Sutra, one of the three sutras that are the principal texts of Pure Land. It is the most important of the many blissful paradises into which Pure Land Buddhists hope to be reborn.

Buddhist scholars generally understand a Pure Land as a transcendent state of being. In Asian folklore, on the other hand, a Pure Land is thought of as a real place, not unlike the way many people conceptualize Heaven. The Pure Land is not the final destination, however.

Hui-yuan and other early masters of Pure Land believed that achieving the liberation of Nirvana through a life of monastic austerity was too difficult for most people. They rejected the "self effort" emphasized by earlier schools of Buddhism. Instead, the ideal is rebirth in a Pure Land, where the toils and worries of ordinary life do not interfere with devoted practice of the Buddha's teachings. By the grace of Amitabha's compassion, those reborn in a Pure Land find themselves only a short step from Nirvana.

Practices of Pure Land

Pure Land Buddhists accept the basic Buddhist teachings of the Four Noble Truths and the Eightfold Path. The primary practice common to all schools of Pure Land is the recitation of the name of Amitabha, who is also called Amida.

In Chinese, this chant is "Na-mu A-mi-to Fo" (Hail, Amida Buddha). The same chant in Japanese, called the Nembutsu, is "Namu Amida Butsu." Sincere and focused chanting becomes a kind of meditation that helps the Pure Land Buddhist visualize Amitabha Buddha. In the most advanced stage of practice, the follower contemplates Amitabha as not separate from his own being.

Pure Land in Japan

Pure Land was founded in Japan by Honen Shonin (1133-1212), a Tendai monk who had become discouraged by monastic practice. Honen emphasized the recitation of the Nembutsu above all other practices, including visualization, rituals, and even the Precepts. Honen's school was called Jodo-kyo or Jodo Shu (School of the Pure Land).

Honen was said to have recited the Nembutsu 60,000 times a day. When not chanting, he preached the virtues of the Nembutsu to laypeople and monastics alike, and he attracted a large following.

Honen's openness to followers from all walks of life caused the displeasure of Japan's ruling elite, who had Honen exiled to a remote part of Japan. Many of Honen's followers were exiled or executed. Honen eventually was pardoned and allowed to return to Kyoto just a year before his death.

Jodo Shu and Jodo Shinshu

After Honen's death, disputes over the proper doctrines and practices of Jodo Shu broke out among his followers, leading to several divergent factions. One faction was the Chinzei, headed by Honen's disciple Shokobo Bencho (1162-1238), also called Shoko. Shoko also stressed many recitations of the Nembutsu but believed the Nembutsu did not have to be one's only practice. Shokobo is considered to be the Second Patriarch of Jodo Shu.

Another disciple, Shinran Shonin (1173-1262), was a monk who broke his vows of celibacy to marry. Shinran stressed faith in Amitabha over the number of times the Nembutsu must be recited. He also came to believe that devotion to Amitabha replaced any need for monasticism. He founded Jodo Shinshu (True School of the Pure Land), which abolished monasteries and authorized married priests. Shodo Shinshu is also sometimes called Shin Buddhism.

Today, Pure Land--including Jodo Shinshu, Jodo Shu, and some smaller sects--is the most popular form of Buddhism in Japan.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The Wheel of Life: The Hell Realm

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Wheel of Life: The Hell Realm
Aug 30th 2011, 10:01

The Hell Realm is depicted as a place partly of fire and partly of ice. In the fiery part of the realm, Hell Beings (Narakas) are subjected to pain and torment. In the icy part, they are frozen.

Interpreted psychologically, Hell Beings are recognized by their acute aggression. Fiery Hell Beings are angry and abusive, and they drive away anyone who would befriend or love them. Icy Hell Beings shove others away with their unfeeling coldness. Then, in the torment of their isolation, their aggression increasingly turns inward, and they become self-destructive.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Monday, 29 August 2011

Buddhism: Dharma in the Wind

Buddhism
Get the latest headlines from the Buddhism GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Dharma in the Wind
Aug 29th 2011, 20:00

Speaking of hurricanes -- wind and weather come up frequently in the Zen koan literature. Possibly the best-known example is Case 29 of the Mumonkan, "Not the Wind, Not the Flag."

Two monks were watching a flag waving in the wind. One said to the other, "The flag is moving."
The other said, "The wind is moving."
Huineng overheard this. He said, "Not the wind, not the flag. Your mind is moving."

(The Mumonkan, also called the "Gateless Gate," is a collection of koans compiled in the 13th century by a Chinese Chan master named Wumen, or Mumon in Japanese. Many of these little stories were already centuries old when Master Wumen collected them.)

This koan has been debated many times over the centuries. In 9th century China, the nun Miaoxin once heard a group of monks debating this koan. "How lamentable, you seventeen blind donkeys!" she said. "How many straw sandals have you wasted? The buddha dharma has not yet appeared even in your dreams!"

The monks asked her to explain. She said, "Step forward!" As they walked toward her, she said, "It's not the wind moving, it's not the flag moving, it's not the mind moving."

In his book The Gateless Barrier, the late Robert Aitken Roshi wrote that when he first heard the koan, he thought Huineng was telling the monks they were being too intellectual. What was moving was the thoughts in their heads. But that wasn't quite it.

Aitken said that some people interpret this koan to mean that there is no reality apart from our perceptions. But that's not quite it, either. He continued, "Hui-neng tossed something into the depths beneath such a view. ... 'It is your mind that moves' -- it is the mind of yourself that moves. You must see into the mind of that self. What is that mind?"

In his commentary on the koan, Master Wumen wrote, "It is not the wind that moves; it is not the flag that moves; it is not the mind that moves. Where do you see the heart of the Patriarch?"

Of this, Zenkei Shibayama Roshi (1894-1974) said, "What a superb comment this is! He is demanding of us that we grasp Master Eno's [Huineng's] real intention."

Shibayama Roshi continued, "It is moving, yet there is no movement. It is standing still, yet there is no standstill. For all that, moving will do and standing still will do. This is the freedom of Zen, which transcends subject and object, movement and� nonmovement, and real peace is enjoyed only when one lives with this freedom."

It's not just the freedom "of Zen," but the freedom of the Buddha.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Metta

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Metta
Aug 29th 2011, 10:01

Definition:

Metta (Pali) is a benevolence toward all beings, without discrimination, that is free of selfish attachment. It is a strong, sincere wish for the happiness of all beings. The Metta Sutta compares metta to the love of a mother, who would give her life for her children.

Metta is often translated as "compassion," which is not inaccurate. However, Pali makes a distinction between metta and karuna, which also means "compassion." Karuna refers to active sympathy and gentle affection, a willingness to bear the pain of others, and possibly pity.

Alternate Spellings: Maitri (Sanskrit)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The Wheel of Life: The Realm of the Gods

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Wheel of Life: The Realm of the Gods
Aug 29th 2011, 10:01

The Realm of the Gods (Devas) sounds like a nice place to live. And, no question, you can do a lot worse. But even the Realm of the Gods isn't perfect. Those born in the God Realm live long and pleasure-filled lives. They have wealth and power and happiness. So what's the catch?

The catch is that because the Devas have such rich and happy lives they don't recognize the truth of suffering. Their happiness is, in a way, a curse, because they have no motivation to seek liberation from the Wheel. Eventually their happy lives end, and they must face rebirth in another, less happy, realm.

The Devas are perpetually at war with their neighbors on the Wheel, the Asuras. This depiction of the Wheel shows the Devas charging the Asuras.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Nichiren Buddhism

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Nichiren Buddhism
Aug 29th 2011, 10:01

In spite of differences, most schools of Buddhism respect each other as valid. There is widespread agreement that any school whose teachings conform to the Four Dharma Seals can be called Buddhist. Nichiren Buddhism, however, was founded on the belief that the true teachings of the Buddha could be found only in the Lotus Sutra.

Nichiren, the Founder

Nichiren (1222-1282) was a Japanese Tendai priest who came to believe the Lotus Sutra constitutes all of the true teachings of the Buddha. He believed also that the Buddha's teachings had entered a time of degeneration. For this reason, people must be taught through simple and direct means rather than by complex doctrines and rigorous monastic practices. Nichiren compacted the teachings of the Lotus Sutra to the daimoku, which is a practice of chanting the phrase Nam Myoho Renge Kyo, "Devotion to the Mystic Law of the Lotus Sutra." Nichiren taught that daily daimoku enables one to realize enlightenment in this life.

However, Nichiren also believed that the other sects of Buddhism in Japan -- in particular, Shingon, Pure Land and Zen -- were corrupted and no longer taught the true dharma. In one of his early essays, The Establishment of Righteousness and the Security of the Country, he blamed a series of earthquakes, storms and famines on these "false" schools. The Buddha must have withdrawn his protection from Japan, he said. Only the practices he, Nichiren, prescribed would return the Buddha's favor.

Nichiren came to believe it was his mission in life to prepare the way for true Buddhism to spread throughout the world from Japan. Some of his followers today consider him to have been a Buddha whose teachings take precedence over those of the historical Buddha.

Practices of Nichiren Buddhism

Daimoku. Daily chanting of Nam Myoho Renge Kyo, or sometimes Namu Myoho Renge Kyo. Some Nichiren Buddhists repeat the chant for a fixed number of times, keeping count with a mala, or rosary. Others chant for a fixed amount of time. For example, a Nichiren Buddhist might set aside fifteen minutes morning and evening for daimoku. The mantra is chanted rhythmically with a meditative focus.

Gohonzon. A mandala created by Nichiren that represents Buddha-nature and which is an object of veneration. The Gohonzon often is inscribed on a hanging scroll and kept in the center of an altar. The Dai-Gohonzon is a particular Gohonzon thought to be in Nichiren's own hand and enshrined at Taisekiji, the head temple of Nichiren Shoshu in Japan. The Dai-Gohonzon is not recognized as authentic by all Nichiren schools.

Gongyo. In Nichiren Buddhism, gongyo refers to chanting of some part of the Lotus Sutra in a formal service. The precise sections of the sutra that are chanted vary by sect.

Kaidan. Kaidan is a sacred place of ordination or a seat of institutional authority. The precise meaning of kaidan in Nichiren Buddhism is a point of doctrinal disagreement. Kaidan might be the place from which true Buddhism will spread to the world, which could be all of Japan. Or, kaidan might be wherever Nichiren Buddhism is sincerely practiced.

Today a number of schools of Buddhism are based on Nichiren's teaching. These are the most prominent:

Nichiren Shu

Nichiren Shu ("Nichiren School" or "Nichiren Faith") is the oldest school of Nichiren Buddhism and considered one of the most mainstream. It is less exclusionary than some other sects. Nichiren Shu recognizes the historical Buddha as the supreme Buddha of this age, and considers Nichiren to be a priest, not a supreme Buddha. Nichiren Shu Buddhists study the Four Noble Truths and and retain some practices common to other schools of Buddhism, such as taking refuge.

Nichren's main temple, Mount Minobu, now is the main temple of Nichiren Shu.

Nichiren Shoshu

Nichiren Shoshu ("True School of Nichiren") was founded by a disciple of Nichiren named Nikko. Nichiren Shoshu considers itself to be the only authentic school of Nichiren Buddhism. Nichiren Shoshu followers believe that Nichiren replaced the historical Buddha as the One True Buddha of our age. The Dai-Gohonzon is highly venerated and kept in the main temple, Taisekiji.

There are three elements to following Nichiren Shoshu. The first is absolute trust in the Gohonzon and in Nichiren's teachings. The second is sincere practice of gongyo and daimoku. The third is study of Nichiren's writings.

Rissho-Kosei-kai

In the 1920s a new movement called Reiyu-kai emerged from Nichiren Shu that taught a combination of Nichiren Buddhism and ancestor worship. Rissho-Kosei-kai ("Society for Establishing Righteousness and Friendly Relations") is a lay organization that split from Reiyu-kai in 1938. A unique practice of Rissho-Kosei-kai is the hoza, or "circle of compassion," in which members sit in a circle to share and discuss problems and how to apply the teachings of the Buddha to resolve them.

Soka-gakkai

Soka-gakkai, "Value Creation Society," was established in 1930 as a lay educational organization of Nichiren Shoshu. After World War II the organization expanded rapidly. Today Soka Gakkai International (SGI) claims 12 million members in 120 countries.

SGI has had its problems with controversy. The current president, Daisaku Ikeda, challenged the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood over leadership and doctrinal issues, resulting in Ikeda's excommunication in 1991 and the separation of SGI and Nichiren Shoshu. Nevertheless, SGI remains a vibrant organization dedicated to Nichiren Buddhist practice, human empowerment and world peace.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: First Buddhist Nuns

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
First Buddhist Nuns
Aug 29th 2011, 10:01

The historical Buddha's most famous statements on women came about when his stepmother and aunt, Maha Pajapati Gotami, asked to join the Sangha and become a nun. The Buddha initially refused her request. Eventually he relented, but in doing so he made conditions and a prediction that remain controversial to this day.

Pajapati was the sister of the Buddha's mother, Maya, who had died a few days after his birth. Maya and Pajapati were both married to his father, King Suddhodana, and after Maya's death Pajapati nursed and raised her sister's son.

Pajapati approached her stepson and asked to be received into the Sangha. The Buddha said no. Still determined, Pajapati and 500 women followers cut off their hair, dressed themselves in patched monk's robes, and set out on foot to follow the traveling Buddha.

When Pajapati and her followers caught up to the Buddha, they were exhausted. Ananda, the Buddha's cousin and most devoted attendant, found Pajapati in tears, dirty, her feet swollen. "Lady, why are you crying like this?" he asked.

She replied to Ananda that she wished to enter the Sangha and receive ordination, but the Buddha had refused her. Ananda promised to speak to the Buddha on her behalf.

The Buddha's Prediction

Ananda sat at the Buddha's side and argued on behalf of the ordination of women. The Buddha continued to refuse the request. Finally, Ananda asked if there was any reason women could not realize enlightenment and enter Nirvana as well as men.

The Buddha admitted there was no reason a woman could not be enlightened. "Women, Ananda, having gone forth are able to realize the fruit of stream-attainment or the fruit of once-returning or the fruit of non-returning or arahantship," he said.

Ananda had made his point, and the Buddha relented. Pajapati and her 500 followers would be the first Buddhist nuns. But he predicted that allowing women into the Sangha would cause his teachings to survive only half as long - 500 years instead of a 1,000.

Unequal Rules

Further, according to the canonical texts, before the Buddha allowed Pajapati into the Sangha, she had to agree to eight Garudhammas, or grave rules, not required of men. These are:

  • A Bhikkuni (nun) even if she was in the Order for 100 years must respect a Bhikkhu (monk) even of a day's standing.
  • A Bhikkuni must reside within 6 hours of traveling distance from the monastery where Bhikkhus reside for advice.
  • On Observance days a Bhikkhuni should consult the Bhikkhus.
  • A Bhikkhuni must spend rainy season retreats under the orders of both Bhikhus and Bhikkhunis.
  • A Bhikkhuni must live her life by both the orders.
  • A Bhikkhuni must on two years obtain the higher ordination (Upasampatha) by both Orders.
  • A Bhikkhuni cannot scold a Bhikkhu.
  • A Bhikkhuni cannot advise a Bhikkhu.

Nuns also have more rules to follow than monks. The Vinaya-pitaka lists about 250 rules for monks and 348 rules for nuns.

Historical Buddha, Misogynist?

The Rev. Patti Nakai of the Buddhist Temple of Chicago tells the story of the Buddha's stepmother and aunt, Prajapati. According to the Rev. Nakai, when Pajapati asked to join the Sangha and become a disciple, "Shakamuni's response was a declaration of the mental inferiority of women, saying they lacked the capacity to understand and practice the teachings of non-attachment to self." This is a version of the story I haven't found elsewhere.

The Rev. Nakai goes on to argue that the historical Buddha was, after all, a man of his time, and would have been conditioned to see women as inferior. However, Pajapati and the other nuns succeeded in breaking down the Buddha's misunderstanding.

"Shakamuni's sexist view had to have been completely eliminated by the time of the famous sutra stories of his encounters with women such as Kisa Gotami (in the tale of the mustard seed) and Queen Vaidehi (Meditation Sutra)," the Rev. Nakai writes. "In those stories, he would have failed to relate to them if he had held any prejudices against them as women."

Concern for the Sangha?

Many scholars argue that the Buddha was concerned that the rest of society, which supported the Sangha, would not approve of the ordination of nuns. Ordaining female disciples was a revolutionary step; there was nothing like it in the other religions of India at the time.

Or, the Buddha might have simply been protective of women, who faced great personal risk in a paternalistic culture when they were not under the protection of a father or husband.

Other scholars have suggested the Garudhammas were added to the canon later, after the Buddha's death, and were not in the original text. They point to discrepancies between the Pali Bhikkuni Vinaya (the section of the Pali Canon dealing with the rules for nuns) and other versions of the texts.

Consequences

Whatever their intention, the rules for nuns have been used to keep nuns in a subservient position. When the orders of nuns died out in India and Sri Lanka centuries ago, conservatives used the rules calling for nuns to be present at nuns' ordination to prevent the institution of new orders. Attempts to begin nuns orders in Tibet and Thailand, where there had been no nuns before, met with enormous resistance.

In recent years, the ordination problem has been solved by allowing properly authorized nuns from other parts of Asia to travel to ordination ceremonies. In America, several co-ed monastic orders have sprung up in which men and women take the same vows and live under the same rules.

And whatever his intentions, the Buddha was certainly wrong about one thing - his prediction about the survival of the teachings. It's been 25 centuries, and the teachings are still with us.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The Wheel of Life: Yama, Lord of the Underworld

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Wheel of Life: Yama, Lord of the Underworld
Aug 29th 2011, 10:01

The terrible face of Yama, who represents death, peers over the top of the Wheel. In spite of his appearance, Yama is not evil. He is a wrathful dharmapala, a creature devoted to protecting Buddhism and Buddhists. Although we may be frightened of death, it is not evil; just inevitable.

In legend, Yama was a holy man who believed he would realize enlightenment if he meditated in a cave for 50 years. In the 11th month of the 49th year, robbers entered the cave with a stolen bull and cut off the bull's head. When they realized the holy man had seen them, the robbers cut off his head also.

But the holy man put on the bull's head and assumed the terrible form of Yama. He killed the robbers, drank their blood, and threatened all of Tibet. He could not be stopped until Manjushri, Bodhisattva of Wisdom, manifested as the even more terrible dharmapala Yamantaka and defeated Yama. Yama then became a protector of Buddhism.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Sunday, 28 August 2011

Buddhism: After Irene

Buddhism
Get the latest headlines from the Buddhism GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
After Irene
Aug 28th 2011, 16:25

Hurricane / Tropical Storm Irene has passed through the New York area and on to New England and its eventual dissipation. From where I live, Irene was a very run-of-the-mill storm. I was anticipating sheets of rain and tree-bending wind, and there was none of that. I didn't even lose electricity.

Elsewhere, of course, people are dealing with flooded basements and cars. I understand millions are without power. Trees and power lines are down. News stories say the storm killed 14 people out of the 65 million it affected.

If it weren't for modern news technology I would have had no idea that a few miles away from me people were dealing with treacherous winds and storm surges. Hurricane? What hurricane? It was just a rainy day.

Dogen said (in Genjokoan),

For example, when you sail out in a boat to the middle of an ocean where no land is in sight, and view the four directions, the ocean looks circular, and does not look any other way. But the ocean is neither round or square; its features are infinite in variety. It is like a palace. It is like a jewel. It only look circular as far as you can see at that time. All things are like this.

Though there are many features in the dusty world and the world beyond conditions, you see and understand only what your eye of practice can reach. In order to learn the nature of the myriad things, you must know that although they may look round or square, the other features of oceans and mountains are infinite in variety; whole worlds are there. It is so not only around you, but also directly beneath your feet, or in a drop of water.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: Most Popular Articles: Zen 101

Buddhism: Most Popular Articles
These articles are the most popular over the last month. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Zen 101
Aug 28th 2011, 10:18

You've heard of Zen. You may have had moments of Zen. But what the bleep is Zen?

The popular idea of Zen is that it's, like, Japanese Dada, with kung fu monks. I regret that the popular idea is a tad romanticized.

The nerdy answer to the question What is Zen? is that Zen is a school of Mahayana Buddhism that emerged in China about 15 centuries ago. In China it is called "Ch'an" Buddhism. Ch'an is the Chinese rendering of the Sanskrit word dhyana, which refers to a mind absorbed in meditation. "Zen" is the Japanese rendering of Ch'an. Zen is called "Thien" in Vietnam and "Seon" in Korea. In any language, the name could be translated "Meditation Buddhism."

Here I want to provide a bare-bones introduction to Zen. Note that what follows is barely a handshake. I will use the word "Zen" for all schools, just to keep it simple.

This article also assumes you know what Buddhism is. If you aren't sure, read the Introduction to Buddhism.

A Very Brief Zen History

Zen began to emerge as a distinctive school of Mahayana Buddhism when the Indian sage Bodhidharma (ca. 470-543) taught at the Shaolin Monastery of China. (Yes, it's a real place, and yes, there is a historic connection between kung fu and Zen.) To this day Bodhidharma is called the First Patriarch of Zen.

Bodhidharma's teachings tapped into some developments already in progress, such as the confluence of philosophical Taoism with Buddhism. Taoism so profoundly impacted early Zen that some philosophers and texts are claimed by both religions. The early Mahayana philosophies of Madhyamika (ca. 2nd century CE) and Yogacara (ca. 3rd century CE) also played huge roles in the development of Zen.

Under the Sixth Patriarch, Huineng (638-713), Zen shed most of its vestigial Indian trappings, becoming more Chinese and more, well, Zennish. Some consider Huineng, not Bodhidharma, to be the true father of Zen. His personality and influence are felt in Zen to this day.

Huineng's tenure was at the beginning of what is still called the Golden Age of Zen. This Golden Age flourished during the same period as China's Tang Dynasty, 618-907. The masters of this Golden Age still speak to us through koans and stories.

During these years Zen organized itself into five "houses," or five schools. Two of these, called in Japanese the Rinzai and the Soto schools, still exist and remain distinctive from each other.

Zen was transmitted to Vietnam very early, possibly as early as the 7th century. A series of teachers transmitted Zen to Korea during the Golden Age. Eihei Dogen (1200-1253), was not the first Zen teacher in Japan, but he was the first to establish a lineage that lives to this day. The West took an interest in Zen after World War II, and now Zen is establishing itself in North America, Europe, and elsewhere.

How Zen Defines Itself

Bodhidharma's definition:

A special transmission outside the scriptures;
No dependence on words and letters;
Direct pointing to the mind of man;
Seeing into one's nature and attaining Buddhahood.

Zen is sometimes called "the face-to-face transmission of the dharma outside the sutras." Throughout the history of Zen, teachers have transmitted their realization of dharma to students by working with them face-to-face. This makes the lineage of teachers critical. A genuine Zen teacher can trace his or her lineage of teachers back to Bodhidharma, and before that to the historical Buddha, and to those Buddhas before the historical Buddha.

Certainly, large parts of the lineage charts have to be taken on faith. But if anything is treated as sacred in Zen, it's the teachers' lineages. With very few exceptions, calling oneself a "Zen teacher" without having received transmission from another teacher is considered a serious defilement of Zen.

While we're talking about teachers, I should mention Zen masters. In my experience, the phrase "Zen master" is hardly ever heard inside Zen. Popular notions of "Zen master," however smarmy, roughly correspond to what a Zen teacher is. The title "Zen master" in Japanese, "zenji," is only given posthumously. In Zen, living Zen teachers are called "Zen teachers." An especially venerable and beloved teacher is called "roshi," which means "old man." I'm not sure how that works when the teacher is a woman, however. In any event, if you ever run into someone who advertises himself as a "Zen master," be skeptical.

Bodhidharma's definition also says that Zen is not an intellectual discipline you can learn from books. Instead, it's a practice of studying mind and seeing into one's nature. The main tool of this practice is zazen.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.
If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions