Sunday, 30 September 2012

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The Fifth Precept

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Fifth Precept
Sep 30th 2012, 11:07

The Fifth Precept of Buddhism, translated from the Pali Canon, is "I undertake the training rule to abstain from fermented and distilled intoxicants which are the basis for heedlessness." Does this mean Buddhists aren't supposed to drink?

About the Precepts of Buddhism

It is said that an enlightened being naturally responds correctly and compassionately to every situation. In this way, the precepts describe the life of a Buddha. They are not a list of commandments or rules to be followed without question. By working with the precepts, we train ourselves to live more compassionately and harmoniously, as enlightened beings live.

An American Zen teacher, the late John Daido Loori, Roshi, said ("kai" is Japanese for "precepts"),

"The Precepts contain the totality of the teachings of the Buddhadharma. ... People inquire about practice, 'What is lay practice?' Kai -- the precepts. 'What is monastic practice?' Kai -- the precepts. 'What is home practice?' Kai -- the precepts. 'What is the sacred?' -- Kai. 'What is the secular?' -- Kai. Everything we see, touch, and do, our way of relating, is right here in these precepts. They are the Buddha Way, the heart of the Buddha." (The Heart of Being: Moral and Ethical Teachings of Zen Buddhism, page 67)

See also "The Buddhist Precepts: An Introduction."

The Fifth Precept is interpreted somewhat differently in Theravada and Mahayana Buddhism.

The Fifth Precept in Theravada Buddhism

Bikkhu Bodhi explains in "Going for Refuge" that the Fifth Precept can be translated from the Pali to prohibit "fermented and distilled liquors which are intoxicants" or "fermented and distilled liquors and other intoxicants." Either way, clearly the guiding purpose of the precept is "to prevent heedlessness caused by the taking of intoxicating substances."

According to Bikkhu Bodhi, violating the precept requires an intoxicant, an intention to take an intoxicant, the activity of ingesting the intoxicant, and the actual ingestion of the intoxicant. Taking medication containing alcohol, opiates or other intoxicants for genuine medical reasons does not count, nor does eating food flavored with a small amount of liquor. Otherwise, Theravada Buddhism considers the Fifth Precept to be a clear prohibition of drinking.

Although Theravada monks generally don't march around calling for prohibition, laypeople are discouraged from drinking. In southeast Asia, where Theravada Buddhism dominates, the monastic sangha often calls for bars and liquor stores to be closed on major uposatha days.

The Fifth Precept in Mahayana Buddhism

For the most part, Mahayana Buddhists follow the precepts as explained in the Mahayana Brahmajala (Brahma Net) Sutra. (There is a Theravada sutra with the same name, but they are different texts.) In this sutra, drinking liquor is a "minor" offense, but selling it is a major breach of the precepts. To drink liquore hurts only oneself, but selling (and, I assume, distributing it for free) hurts others and is a violation of the Bodhisattva vows.

Within the several schools of Mahayana there are some sectarian differences on the matter of drinking, but the Fifth Precept often is not treated as an absolute prohibition. Further, the meaning of "intoxicant" is broadened to include anything that distracts us from the path, not just alchohol and drugs.

Zen teacher Reb Anderson says, "In the broadest sense, anything we ingest, inhale, or inject into our system without reverence for all life becomes an intoxicant." (Being Upright: Zen Meditation and the Bodhisattva Precepts, page 137). He describes the act of intoxication as bringing something into yourself to manipulate your experience. This "something" can be "coffee, tea, chewing gum, sweets, sex, sleep, power, fame, and even food." One of my intoxicants is television (I find crime dramas soothing; I have no idea why).

This doesn't mean we are prohibited from using coffee, tea, chewing gum, etc. It means to take care not to use them as intoxicants, as ways of soothing and distracting ourselves from the direct and intimate experience of life. In other words, whatever we use to distract ourselves into heedlessness is an intoxicant.

In the course of our lives most of us develop mental and physical habits that enable nice, cozy states of heedlessness. The challenge of working with the Fifth Precept is to identify what those are and deal with them. From this perspective, the question of whether to abstain from alcohol entirely or drink in moderation is an individual one that requires some spiritual maturity and self-honesty.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Tibetan Buddhist History

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Tibetan Buddhist History
Sep 30th 2012, 11:07

The history of Buddhism in Tibet begins with Bon. The Bon religion of Tibet was animistic and shamanistic, and elements of it live on today, to one degree or another, in Tibetan Buddhism.

Although Buddhist scriptures may have made their way into Tibet centuries earlier, the history of Buddhism in Tibet effectively begins in 641 CE. In that year, King Songtsen Gampo (d. ca. 650) unified Tibet through military conquest and took two Buddhist wives, Princess Bhrikuti of Nepal and Princess Wen Cheng of China. The princesses are credited with introducing their husband to Buddhism.

Songtsen Gampo built the first Buddhist temples in Tibet, including the Jokhang in Lhasa and the Changzhug in Nedong. He also put Tibetan translators to work on the Sanskrit scriptures.

Guru Rinpoche and Nyingma

During the reign of King Trisong Detsen, which began about 755 CE, Buddhism became the official religion of the Tibetan people. The King also invited famous Buddhist teachers such as Shantarakshita and Padmasambhava to Tibet.

Padmasambhava, remembered by Tibetans as Guru Rinpoche ("Precious Master"), was an Indian master of tantra whose influence on the development of Tibetan Buddhism is incalculable. He is credited with building Samye, the first monastery in Tibet, in the late 8th century. Nyingma, one of the four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism, claims Guru Rinpoche as its patriarch.

According to legend, when Guru Rinpoche arrived in Tibet he pacified the Bon demons and made them protectors of the Dharma.

Suppression

In 836 King Tri Ralpachen, a supporter of Buddhism, died. His half brother Langdarma became the new King of Tibet. Langdarma suppressed Buddhism and re-established Bon as the official religion of Tibet. In 842, Langdarma was assassinated by a Buddhist monk. Rule of Tibet was divided between Langdarma's two sons. However, in the centuries that followed Tibet disintegrated into many small kingdoms.

Mahamudra

While Tibet was plunged into chaos, there were developments in India that would be keenly important to Tibetan Buddhism. The Indian sage Tilopa (989-1069) developed a system of meditation and practice called Mahamudra. Mahamudra is, very simply, a methodology for understanding the intimate relation between mind and reality.

Tilopa transmitted the teachings of Mahamudra to his disciple, another Indian sage named Naropa (1016-1100).

Marpa and Milarepa

Marpa Chokyi Lodro (1012-1097) was a Tibetan who traveled to India and studied with Naropa. After years of study, Marpa was declared a dharma heir of Naropa. He returned to Tibet, bringing with him Buddhist scriptures in Sanskrit that Marpa translated into Tibetan. Hence, is he called "Marpa the Translator."

Marpa's most famous student was Milarepa (1040-1123), who is remember especially for his beautiful songs and poems.

One of Milarepa's students, Gampopa (1079-1153), founded the Kagyu school, one of the four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism.

The Second Dissemination

The great Indian scholar Dipamkara Shrijnana Atisha (ca. 980-1052) came to Tibet by invitation of King Jangchubwo. At the request of the King, Atisha wrote a book for the the king's subjects called Byang-chub lam-gyi sgron-ma, or "Lamp to the Path of Enlightenment."

Although Tibet was still politically fragmented, Atisha's arrival in Tibet in 1042 marked the beginning of what is called the "Second Dissemination" of Buddhism in Tibet. Through Atisha's teachings and writings, Buddhism once again became the main religion of the people of Tibet.

Sakyas and Mongols

In 1073, Khon Konchok Gyelpo (1034-l 102) built Sakya Monastery in southern Tibet. His son and successor, Sakya Kunga Nyingpo, founded the Sakya sect, one of the four major schools of Tibetan Buddhism.

In 1207, Mongol armies invaded and occupied Tibet. In 1244, Sakya Pandita Kunga Gyeltsen (1182-1251), a Sakya master was invited to Mongolia by Godan Khan, grandson of Genghis Khan. Through Sakya Pandita's teachings Godon Khan became a Buddhist. In 1249, Sakya Pandita was appointed Viceroy of Tibet by the Mongols.

In 1253, Phagba (1235-1280) succeeded Sakya Pandita at the Mongol court. Phagba became a religious teacher to Godan Khan's famous successor, Kublai Khan. In 1260, Kublai Khan named Phagpa the Imperial Preceptor of Tibet. Tibet would be ruled by a succession of Sakya lamas until 1358, when central Tibet came under control of the Kagyu sect.

The Fourth School: Gelug

The last of the four great schools of Tibetan Buddhism,the Gelug school, was founded by Je Tsongkhapa (1357-1419), one of Tibet's greatest scholars. The first Gelug monastery, Ganden, was founded by Tsongkhapa in 1409.

The third head lama of the Gelug school, Sonam Gyatso (1543-1588) converted the Mongol leader Altan Khan to Buddhism. It is commonly believed that Altan Khan originated the title Dalai Lama, meaning "Ocean of Wisdom," in 1578 to give to Sonam Gyatso. Others point out that since gyatso is Tibetan for "ocean," the title "Dalai Lama" simply might have been a Mongol translation of Sonam Gyatso's name -- Lama Gyatso.

In any event, "Dalai Lama" became the title of the highest-ranking lama of the Gelug school. Since Sonam Gyatso was the third lama in that lineage, he became the 3rd Dalai Lama. The first two Dalai Lamas received the title posthumously.

It was the 5th Dalai Lama, Lobsang Gyatso (1617-1682), who first became ruler of all Tibet. The "Great Fifth" formed a military alliance with the Mongol leader Gushri Khan. When two other Mongol chiefs and the ruler of Kang, an ancient kingdom of central Asia, invaded Tibet, Gushri Khan routed them and declared himself king of Tibet. In 1642, Gushri Khan recognized the 5th Dalai Lama as the spiritual and temporal leader of Tibet.

The succeeding Dalai Lamas and their regents remained the chief administrators of Tibet until the invasion of Tibet by China in 1950 and the exile of the 14th Dalai Lama in 1959.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddhism Body Art Project: Lotus and Dharma Wheels

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Buddhism Body Art Project: Lotus and Dharma Wheels
Sep 30th 2012, 11:07

The Buddhism Body Art Project is a gallery of Buddhist-themed tattoos sent in by readers and others.

Dharma Wheels and a Lotus

Two of the Eight Auspicious Symbols -- Dharma Wheels and a lotus. The hands and feet belong to Ali Muelas, who designed these tattoos.

Owner: Ali Muelas. Photographer: Andrea Wall

The lotus is rooted in deep mud, but the blossom and opens in the sun, beautiful and fragrant. In Buddhism, the lotus represents the true nature of beings, who rise through samsara into the beauty and clarity of enlightenment.

The eight spokes of the Dharma Wheel represent the Eightfold Path. According to tradition, the Dharma Wheel was first turned when the Buddha delivered his first sermon after his enlightenment.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Saturday, 29 September 2012

Buddhism: Determining the Dharma

Buddhism
Get the latest headlines from the Buddhism GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Determining the Dharma
Sep 29th 2012, 16:54

In the epilogue of the Vimalakirti Sutra, a Mahayana text, there is a conversation between a prince named Candracchattra -- the historical Buddha in a previous life -- and a buddha named Bhaisajyaraja, which means "king of medicine." However, the identities of these personages are not so important as what is said.

Candracchattra was told that the supreme worship is dharma-worship, and he sought out Bhaisajyaraja to find out what dharma-worship might be. Bhaisajyaraja's answer drags on a bit, but he sums up by saying "Dharma-worship consists of determining the Dharma according to the Dharma; applying the Dharma, according to the Dharma" (Robert Thurman translation, page 99).

Without getting hung up on the word worship, which I realize raises some red flags for some of us, let us consider what this is saying.

Awhile back I wrote a post asking for more information on the Four Reliances, or Reliables. Dosho Port dropped by to recommend this web page, which is a talk on the Reliances as given in the Vimalakirti Sutra. I'm not sure who the speaker is, but there's a lot of good stuff in the talk, and it brings up the dharma-worship question. What does determining the dharma according to the dharma mean?

"So what does this mean? It means, not determining, or not understanding, the Dharma according to that which is not the Dharma. For us in the West it means, not determining, not understanding the Dharma, according to Christian beliefs, whether conscious, unconscious, or semiconscious. It means not determining or understanding the Dharma in accordance with modern secularist, humanist, rationalist, scientific, modes of thought. It means not determining or understanding the Dharma in accordance with the fanciful ideas of the worthy, but woolly-minded people who organize such things the Festival of body, mind and spirit.

"The Dharma is to be determined in accordance with the Dharma. The Dharma is to be understood in accordance with the Dharma. To determine it or understand it in accordance with anything else, anything other than itself, is to falsify it, is to distort it, is to betray it. In the same way, Dharma worship consists of applying the Dharma according to the Dharma. If one tries for example to break off a bit of the Dharma, so to speak, and apply it according to Christian ideas, it will not work - that is to say it will not work as the Dharma. There's no such thing as 'Christian Zen' for example. The Dharma is to be applied according to the Dharma."

I agree with this, although I suspect some of you will not.

There is a way to view Buddhism through a Christian lens that is quite lovely; there is a way to view Christianity through a Buddhist lens that is also quite lovely. However, the Christianity viewed through a Buddhist lens would be a bit alien to most Christians. And the Christian lens focused on Buddhism tends to filter out the perfection of wisdom that is unique to Buddhism.

There aren't any "shoulds" or "shouldn'ts" here, and I'm not demanding that everyone drop blended traditions. A blended tradition may be just right for some parts of the path. I'm saying that Buddhism can't be blended with another religion or philosophy without distorting the dharma. And notice I'm using "Buddhism" and "dharma" to mean slightly different things (see "dharma").

As the unknown author said, the same thing goes for secularist, humanist, rationalist, and scientific modes of thought. If you engage with Buddhism by demanding that it conform to some per-determined standard, whether cultural, intellectual, or ideological, then you've closed the door to the dharma. What remains may be a perfectly satisfactory philosophy, but it's not the dharma.

This is a difficult thing to explain, and it may make no sense if you haven't engaged in a Buddhist practice tradition for a while.  Very simply, Buddhism proposes that there's something you're not seeing, something you don't understand and that can't be grasped intellectually. The practice allows dharma to enter you and reveal itself. If you put conditions on it at the beginning, or keep your mind closed to anything you don't already understand, dharma cannot reveal itself.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Soka Gakkai

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Soka Gakkai
Sep 29th 2012, 11:09

Most non-Buddhists who have heard of Soka Gakkai International (SGI) know it as Buddhism for the stars. If you saw the Tina Turner bio-flick “What’s Love Got to Do With It?” you saw a dramatization of Turner’s introduction to Soka Gakkai in the late 1970s. Other well-known members include actor Orlando Bloom; musicians Herbie Hancock and Wayne Shorter; and Mariane Pearl, the widow of Daniel Pearl.

From its origins in pre-war Japan, Soka Gakkai has promoted personal empowerment and humanist philosophy combined with Buddhist devotion and practice. Yet as its membership grew in the West, the organization found itself struggling with dissension, controversy, and accusations of being a a cult.

Origins of Soka Gakkai

The first incarnation of Soka Gakkai, called Soka Kyoiku Gakkai ("Value-Creating Education Society"), was founded in Japan in 1930 by Tsunesaburo Makiguchi (1871-1944), an author and educator. Soka Kyoiku Gakkai was a lay organization dedicated to humanistic education reform that also embodied the religious teachings of Nichiren Shoshu, a branch of the Nichiren school of Buddhism.

During the 1930s the military took control of the Japanese government, and a climate of militant nationalism gripped Japan. The government demanded that patriotic citizens honor the Japanese indigenous religion, Shinto. Makiguchi and his close associate Josei Toda (1900-1958) refused to participate in Shinto rituals and worship, and they were arrested as “thought criminals” in 1943. Makiguchi died in prison in 1944.

After the war and his release from prison, Toda re-formed Soka Kyoiku Gakkai into Soka Gakkai ("Value-Creating Society") and shifted the focus from education reform to the promotion of Nichiren Shoshu Buddhism. In the post-war era, many Japanese were attracted to Soka Gakkai because of its emphasis on self-empowerment through socially engaged Buddhism.

Soka Gakkai International

In 1960, Daisaku Ikeda, then 32 years old, became president of Soka Gakkai. In 1975 Ikeda expanded the organization into Soka Gakkai International (SGI), which today has affiliate organizations in 120 countries and an estimated global membership of 12 million.

In the 1970s and 1980s SGI grew rapidly in the West through aggressive recruitment. Patrick Duffy, who played Bobby Ewing on the popular 1980s television series Dallas, became a convert and spoke glowingly of SGI in many widely read interviews. SGI also drew attention through splashy publicity events. For example, according to Daniel Golden of the Boston Globe (October 15, 1989),

"NSA [Nichiren Shoshu of America, now known as SGI-USA] stole the show at Bush’s inauguration in January by displaying on the Washington Mall the world’s largest chair â€" a 39-foot-high model of the chair that George Washington sat in as he presided over the Continental Congress. The Guinness Book of World Records has twice cited NSA for assembling the most American flags ever in a parade, although in one mention it misidentified the group as 'Nissan Shoshu,' confusing the religious organization with the automaker."

Is SGI a Cult?

SGI came to widespread public attention in the West during the 1970s and 1980s, a time of growing concern about cults. For example, it was in 1978 that 900 members of the Peoples Temple cult committed suicide in Guyana. SGI, a rapidly growing, sometimes flamboyant non-western religious organization, looked suspiciously like a cult to many people and to this day remains on some cult watch lists.

You can find diverse definitions of "cult," including some that say "any religion other than mine is a cult." You can find people who argue all of Buddhism is a cult. A checklist created by Marcia Rudin, M.A., a founding director of the International Cult Education Program, seems more objective.

I have no personal experience with SGI, but over the years I've met many SGI members. They don't seem to me to fit the Rudin checklist. For example, SGI members are not isolated from the non-SGI world. They are not anti-woman, anti-child, or anti-family. They are not waiting for the Apocalypse. I do not believe they use deceptive tactics to recruit new members. Claims that SGI is bent on world domination are, I suspect, a tad exaggerated.

Break With Nichiren Shoshu

Soka Gakkai was not organized by Nichiren Shoshu, but after World War II Soka Gakkai and Nichiren Shoshu developed a mutually beneficial alliance. Over time, however, tensions grew between SGI President Ikeda and the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood over questions of doctrine and leadership. In 1991 Nichiren Shoshu formally renounced SGI and excommunicated Ikeda. News of the break with Nichiren Shoshu rippled like shock waves through the SGI membership.

However, according to Richard Hughes Seager in Buddhism in America (Columbia University Press, 2000), a majority of American members remained with SGI. Before the break they had had little direct contact with the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood; SGI-USA had always been run by laypersons, and that did not change. Many of the issues causing the rift made little sense outside Japan.

Further, Seager wrote, since the break with the priesthood SGI-USA has become more democratic and less hierarchical. New initiatives placed women in more leadership positions and enhanced SGI's racial diversity. SGI also has become less exclusionary. Seager continued,

"Religious dialogue, both interreligious and inter-Buddhist, is now on the SGI agenda, which would not have been the case under the sectarian leadership of the Nichiren Shoshu priesthood. All of these initiatives have contributed to an opening up of Soka Gakkai. A frequent statement in leadership circles is that a new, egalitarian SGI is a 'work in progress.'"

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: A Bubble in a Stream

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
A Bubble in a Stream
Sep 29th 2012, 11:09

One of the most frequently quoted passages from the Mahayana Buddhist sutras is this short verse --

So you should view this fleeting world --
A star at dawn, a bubble in a stream,
A flash of lightening in a summer cloud,
A flickering lamp, a phantom, and a dream.

This common translation has been manipulated a bit so that it rhymes in English. The translator Red Pine (Bill Porter) gives us a more literal translation --

As a lamp, a cataract, a star in space / an illusion, a dewdrop, a bubble / a dream, a cloud, a flash of lightening / view all created things like this.

In Buddhist texts, a short verse like this is called a gatha. What does this gatha signify, and who said it?

This verse is found in two sutras, the Diamond Sutra and a sutra called "The Perfection of Wisdom in 500 Lines." Both these texts are part of a canon of texts called the Prajnaparamita Sutras. Prajnaparamita means "perfection of wisdom." According to scholars, most of the Prajnaparamita Sutras probably were written early in the first millennium CE, although some may date from the 1st century BCE.

The verse often is attributed to the Buddha, but if the scholars are right about the date, the historical Buddha did not say this. We can only speculate about who the poet might have been.

The Gatha and the Diamond Sutra

Of the two texts containing this verse, the Diamond Sutra is by far the more widely read. The gatha is found very near the end of the sutra, and it is sometimes read as the summation or explanation of the preceding text. Some English translators have "tweaked" the text a bit to emphasize the verse's role as a summary or capping verse. The verse seems to be about impermanence, so we are often told the Diamond Sutra primarily is about impermanence.

The scholar-translator Red Pine (Bill Portman) disagrees. A literal reading of the Chinese and Sanskrit doesn't make it seem to be an explanation of the text at all, he says.

"This gatha, I suggest, is not meant as an example of explaining this teaching, for the Buddha has just noted that the bodhisattva's explanation is no explanation. This gatha is simply an offering given to us by the Buddha, the Buddha's way of saying goodbye." [Red Pine, The Diamond Sutra (Counterpoint, 2001), p. 432]

Red Pine also questions whether the gatha was in the original text, which has been lost. The same gatha provides a summary of the Perfection of Wisdom in 500 Lines, and it actually fits better into that sutra. Some long-ago copyist might have thought the Diamond Sutra needed a stronger finish and tossed in his favorite verse.

The Diamond Sutra is a work of great depth and subtlety. To most first-time readers, it is steeper than the Matterhorn. No doubt many have slogged through the text in a state of complete bafflement to find this little oasis of a gatha at the end. At last, something that is understandable!

But is it?

What the Gatha Means

In his book The Diamond That Cuts Through Illusion: Commentaries on the Prajnaparamita Diamond Sutra, Thich Nhat Hanh says that "created things" (see Red Pine's translation, above) or "composed things" are not what they appear to be.

"Composed things are all objects of mind that are conditioned to arise, exist for awhile, and then disappear, according to the principle of dependent co-arising. Everything in life seems to follow this pattern, and, although things look real, they are actually more like the things a magician conjures up. We can see and hear them clearly, but they are not really what they appear to be."

The scholar-translator Edward Conze gives the Sanskrit with English translation --

Taraka timiram dipo
Maya-avasyaya budbudam
Supinam vidyud abhram ca
Evam drastavyam samskrtam.

As stars, a fault of vision, as a lamp,
A mock show, dew drops, or a bubble,
A dream, a lightning flash, or cloud,
So should one view what is conditioned.

The gatha is not just telling us that everything is impermanent; it is telling us that everything is illusory. Things are not what they appear to be. We should not be fooled by appearance; we should not regard phantoms as "real."

Thich Nhat Hanh continues,

"After reading this verse we may think that the Buddha is saying that all dharmas [in the sense of 'phenomena'] are impermanent -- like clouds, smoke, or a flash of lightning. The Buddha is saying 'All dharmas are impermanent,' but he is not saying that they are not here. He only wants us to see the things in themselves. We may think that we have already grasped reality, but, in fact, we are only grasping its fleeting images. If we look deeply into things, we will be able to free ourselves from the illusion."

This points us to the wisdom teachings, which are the main teachings in the Prajnaparamita Sutras. The wisdom is the realization that all phenomena are empty of self-essence, and any identity we give them comes from our own mental projection. The main teaching is not so much that things are impermanent; it is pointing to the nature of their impermanent existence.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Koan

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Koan
Sep 29th 2012, 11:09

Definition:

The Japanese word koan means "public notice." It is taken from the Chinese kung-an, which is a legal proceeding. Formally, koans are presented as cases, with a "main case" presenting a phrase or fragment of a story, a brief commentary, and a capping verse.

In the Rinzai school of Zen, a student is given a particular koan to "solve" in his zazen practice. Most koans involve a paradox that cannot be solved by reason or intellect. The resolution forces the student into a different level of consciousness or comprehension.

It's important to understand koans as a means for teachers and students to work together. In private interviews with the teacher called dokusan, the student asks for guidance or for approval of his understanding. The face-to-face work between student and teacher is an essential part of Zen training.

Classic koan collections include the Mumonkan, also called The Gateless Gate; the Hekiganroku, or Blue Cliff Record; and the Shoyoroku, The Book of Equanimity.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddha's Birthday

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Buddha's Birthday
Sep 29th 2012, 11:09

The birthday of the historical Buddha is celebrated on different dates by various schools of Buddhism. In most of Asia it is observed on the first full moon date of the fourth month in the Chinese lunar calendar (typically May). But in other parts of Asia the day falls a month or more either earlier or later.

Read More: For the dates of Buddha's Birthday, see "When Is Buddha's Birthday?"

Theravada Buddhists combine observance of Buddha's birth, enlightenment and death into one holiday, called Vesak or Visakha Puja. Tibetan Buddhists also combine observance of these three events into one holiday, Saga Dawa Duchen, which usually falls in June.

Read More: Vesak Puja

Most Mahayana Buddhists, however, separate observance of Buddha's birth, death and enlightenment into three separate holidays held at different times of year. In Mahayana countries, Buddha's birthday usually falls on the same day as Vesak. But in some countries, such as Korea, it is a week-long observance that begins a week ahead of Vesak. In Japan, which adopted the Gregorian calendar in the 19th century, Buddha's Birthday always falls on April 8.

Whatever the date, Buddha's Birthday is a time for hanging lanterns and enjoying communal meals. Joyous parades of musicians, dancers, floats, and dragons are common throughout Asia.

In Japan, Buddha’s birthday -- Hana Matsuri, or “Flower Festival” -- is celebrated every year on April 8. Those who go to temples bring offerings of fresh spring flowers.

Washing the Baby Buddha

One ritual found throughout Asia and in most schools of Buddhism is that of washing the baby Buddha.

According to Buddhist legend, when the Buddha was born he stood straight, took seven steps, and declared "I alone am the World-Honored One." And he pointed up with one hand and down with the other, to indicate he would unite heaven and earth. I am told the seven steps represent seven directions -- north, south, east, west, up, down, and here. Mahayana Buddhists interpret "I alone am the World-Honored One" in a way that "I" represents all sentient beings throughout space and time -- everyone, in other words.

The ritual of "washing the baby Buddha" commemorates this moment. A small standing figure of the baby Buddha, with the right hand pointing up and the left hand pointing down, is placed on an elevated stand within a basin on an altar. People approach the altar reverently, fill a ladle with water or tea, and pour it over the figure to "wash" the baby.

Read More: The Birth of the Buddha

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Friday, 28 September 2012

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddhism in Japan I

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Buddhism in Japan I
Sep 28th 2012, 11:06

It took several centuries for Buddhism to travel from India to Japan. Once Buddhism was established in Japan, however, it flourished. Buddhism had an incalculable impact on Japanese civilization. At the same time, schools of Buddhism imported from mainland Asia became distinctively Japanese.

The Introduction of Buddhism to Japan

In the 6th century -- either 538 or 552 CE, depending on which historian one consults -- a delegation sent by a Korean prince arrived at the court of the Emperor of Japan. The Koreans brought with them Buddhist sutras, an image of the Buddha, and a letter from the Korean prince praising the dharma. This was the official introduction of Buddhism to Japan.

The Japanese aristocracy promptly split into pro- and anti-Buddhist factions. Buddhism gained little real acceptance until the reign of the Empress Suiko and her regent, Prince Shotoku, 592-628 CE. The Empress and the Prince established Buddhism as the state religion. They encouraged expression of the dharma in arts, in philanthropy, and in education. They built temples and established monasteries.

In the centuries that followed, Buddhism in Japan developed robustly. During the 7th through 9th centuries Buddhism in China enjoyed a "golden age," and Chinese monks brought the newest developments in practice and scholarship to Japan. The many schools of Buddhism that developed in China were established in Japan also.

Nara Buddhism

Six schools of Buddhism emerged in Japan in the 7th and 8th centuries, all but two of which have disappeared. Because these schools flourished mostly during the Nara Period of Japanese history (709-795 CE), they are sometimes today lumped together into one category, Nara Buddhism. The two schools that still have some following are Hosso and Kegon.

Hosso. The Hosso, or "Dharma Character," school, was introduced to Japan by the monk Dosho (629-700). Dosho went to China to study with Hsuan-tsang, the founder of the Wei-shih (also called Fa-hsiang) school. Wei-shih had developed from the Yogachara school of India. Very simply, Yogachara teaches that things have no reality in themselves. The reality we thnk we perceive does not exist except as as a process of knowing.

Kegon. In 740 the Chinese monk Shen-hsiang introduced the Huayan, or "Flower Garland," school to Japan. Called Kegon in Japan, this school of Buddhism is best known for its teachings on the interpenetration of all things -- that is, all things and all beings not only reflect all other things and beings but also the Absolute in its totality. See, for example, Indra's Net.

Emperor Shomu, who reigned from 724 to 749, was a patron of Kegon. He began construction of the magnificent Todaiji, or Great Eastern Monastery, in Nara. Todaiji's main hall is the world's largest wooden building to this day. It houses the Great Buddha of Nara, a massive bronze seated figure that is 15 meters, or about 50 feet, tall. Today, Todaiji remains the center of the Kegon school.

After the Nara period, five other schools of Buddhism emerged in Japan that remain prominent today. These are Tendai, Shingon, Jodo, Zen and Nichiren.

Tendai

The monk Saicho (767-822; also called Dengyo Daishi) traveled to China in 804 and returned the following year with the doctrines of the Tiantai school. The Japanese form, Tendai, rose to great prominence and was a dominant school of Buddhism in Japan for centuries.

Tendai is best known for two distinctive features. One, it considers the Lotus Sutra to be the supreme sutra and the perfect expression of the Buddha's teachings. Second, it synthesizes the teachings of other schools, resolving contradictions and finding a middle way between extremes.

Saicho's other contribution to Japanese Buddhism was the establishment of the great Buddhist education and training center at Mount Hiei, near the new capital of Kyoto. As we'll see, many important historical figures of Japanese Buddhism began their study of Buddhism at Mount Hiei.

Shingon

Like Saicho, the monk Kukai (774-835; also called Kobo Daishi) traveled to China in 804. There he studied Buddhist tantra and returned two years later to establish the distinctively Japanese school of Shingon and build a monastery on Mount Koya, about 50 miles south of Kyoto.

Shingon is the only non-Tibetan school of Vajrayana. Many of the teachings and rituals of Shingon are esoteric, passed orally from teacher to student and not made public. Shingon remains one of the largest schools of Buddhism in Japan.

Jodo Shu and Jodo Shinshu

To honor his father's dying wish, Honen (1133-1212) became a monk at Mount Hiei. Dissatisfied with Buddhism as it was taught to him, Honen introduced the Chinese school of Pure Land to Japan by founding Jodo Shu.

Very simply, Pure Land emphasizes faith the Buddha Amitabha, Called Amida Butsu in Japanese, through which one may be reborn in the Pure Land and be nearer to Nirvana. Pure Land is sometimes called Amidism.

Honen converted another Mount Hiei monk, Shinran (1173-1263). Shinran was Honen's disciple for six years. After Honen was exiled in 1207, Shinran gave up his monk's robes, married and fathered children. As a layman he founded Jodo Shinshu, a school of Buddhism for laypeople. Jodo Shinshu today is the largest sect in Japan.

In Part II: Zen comes to Japan; Nichiren, a fiery reformer, takes on the Japanese Buddhist establishment; a warlord burns Mount Hiei.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The Dhammapada

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Dhammapada
Sep 28th 2012, 11:06

The Dhammapada is only a tiny part of the Buddhist canon of scripture, but it has long been the part most popular, and most translated, in the West. This slim volume of 423 short verses from the Pali Tripitaka is sometimes called the Buddhist Book of Proverbs. It is a treasury of gems that illuminate and inspire.

The Dhammapada is part of the Sutta-pitaka (collection of sermons) of the Tripitaka and can be found in in the Khuddaka Nikaya -- "collection of little texts" -- a section that was added to the canon about 250 BCE. (For more on the Pali Canon and how it came to be written, please see "The Pali Canon: The First Buddhist Scriptures.") The verses, arranged in 26 chapters, are taken from several parts of the Pali Tripitaka and a few other early sources. In the 5th century the sage Buddhaghosa wrote an important commentary that presented each verse in its original context to shed more light on the verses' meaning.

The Pali word dhamma (in Sanskrit, dharma) in Buddhism has several meanings. It can refer to the cosmic law of cause, effect and rebirth; the doctrines taught by the Buddha; a thought object, phenomenon or manifestation of reality; and more. Pada means "foot" or "path."

The Dhammapada in English

In 1881, Clarendon Press of Oxford (now Oxford University Press) published what were most likely the first English translations of Buddhist sutras. All were from the Pali Tripitaka. One of these was T. W. Rhys Davids's Buddhist Suttas, selections that included the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta, the Buddha's first sermon. Another was Viggo Fausboll's Sutta-Nipata. The third was F. Max Muller's translation of the Dhammapada. (In 1855 Fausboll had published the first translation of the Dhammapada into a western language; however, that language was Latin.)

Today there are a great many translations in print and on the Web. But the quality of those translations varies widely.

Translating an ancient Asian language into contemporary English is a perilous thing. Ancient Pali has many words and phrases that have no equivalent in English, for example. For that reason, the accuracy of the translation depends as much on the translators' understanding of the text as on his translating skills.

For example, here is Muller's translation of the opening verse:

All that we are is the result of what we have thought: it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts. If a man speaks or acts with an evil thought, pain follows him, as the wheel follows the foot of the ox that draws the carriage.

Compare this with a recent translation by Acharya Buddharakkhita:

Mind precedes all mental states. Mind is their chief; they are all mind-wrought. If with an impure mind a person speaks or acts suffering follows him like the wheel that follows the foot of the ox.

And Thanissaro Bhikkhu:

Phenomena are preceded by the heart,
ruled by the heart,
made of the heart.
If you speak or act
with a corrupted heart,
then suffering follows you --
as the wheel of the cart,
the track of the ox
that pulls it.

I bring this up because I have seen people interpret Muller's translation of the first verse as something like Descartes' "I think, therefore I am." Or, at least "I am what I think I am." And while there may be some truth in the latter interpretation, if you read the Buddharakkhita and Thanissaro translations you see something else entirely. This verse primarily is about the creation of karma. In Buddhaghosa's commentary we learn that the Buddha illustrated this verse with a story of a physician who spitefully made a woman blind, and so suffered blindness himself.

It's helpful also to have some understanding that "mind" in Buddhism is understood in particular ways. Usually "mind" is a translation of manas, which is understood to be a sense organ that has thoughts and ideas as its objects, in the same way a nose has an odor as its object. To more thoroughly understand this point, and the role of perception, mental formation and consciousness in the creation of karma, see "The Five Skandhas: An Introduction to the Aggregates."

The point is that it's wise not to be too attached to ideas about what any one verse means until you've compared three or four translations of it.

Favorite Verses

Choosing favorite verses from the Dhammapada is highly subjective, but here are some of mine. Please feel free to add your own verses to the end of the article. These are from the Acharya Buddharakkhita translation ("The Dhammapada: The Buddha's Path of Wisdom," translated from the Pali by Acharya Buddharakkhita, with an introduction by Bhikkhu Bodhi. Access to Insight, with the permission of the Buddhist Publication Society.) Verse numbers are in parentheses.

  • Hatred is never appeased by hatred in this world. By non-hatred alone is hatred appeased. This is a law eternal. (5)
  • Those who mistake the unessential to be essential and the essential to be unessential, dwelling in wrong thoughts, never arrive at the essential. (11)
  • Just as rain breaks through an ill-thatched house, so passion penetrates an undeveloped mind. (13)
  • The fool worries, thinking, "I have sons, I have wealth." Indeed, when he himself is not his own, whence are sons, whence is wealth? (62)
  • A fool who knows his foolishness is wise at least to that extent, but a fool who thinks himself wise is a fool indeed. (63)
  • Though all his life a fool associates with a wise man, he no more comprehends the Truth than a spoon tastes the flavor of the soup. (64)
  • Well done is that action of doing which one repents not later, and the fruit of which one, reaps with delight and happiness. (68)
  • Just as a solid rock is not shaken by the storm, even so the wise are not affected by praise or blame. (81)
  • Better than a thousand useless words is one useful word, hearing which one attains peace. (100)
  • Think not lightly of evil, saying, "It will not come to me." Drop by drop is the water pot filled. Likewise, the fool, gathering it little by little, fills himself with evil. (121)
  • Think not lightly of good, saying, "It will not come to me." Drop by drop is the water pot filled. Likewise, the wise man, gathering it little by little, fills himself with good. (122)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Vajra

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Vajra
Sep 28th 2012, 11:06

Definition:

When used in Buddhist literature, the Sanskrit word vajra usually is defined "diamond" or "adamantine." It can also mean "thunderbolt," although this definition of vajra is more often associated with Hinduism.

A diamond is spotlessly pure and indestructible. As such, the word vajra sometimes signifies enlightenment, or the absolute reality of shunyata, "emptiness."

The vajra also is ritual object associated with Tibetan Buddhism, also called by its Tibetan name, dorje. These objects usually are made of bronze, vary in size and have three, five or nine spokes that usually close at each end in lotus shape. The number of spokes and the way they come together, or not, at the ends have numerous symbolic meanings.

In Tibetan ritual, the vajra often is used together with a bell. The vajra is held in the left hand and represents the male principle, upaya, action or means. The bell is held in the right hand and represents the female principle, prajna, wisdom.

A double dorje, or vishvavajra, are two dorjes connected to form a cross. A double dorje represents the foundation of the physical world and is also associated with certain tantric deities.

Also Known As: Dorje (Tibetan)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, 27 September 2012

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: First Buddhist Nuns

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
First Buddhist Nuns
Sep 27th 2012, 11:07

The historical Buddha's most famous statements on women came about when his stepmother and aunt, Maha Pajapati Gotami, asked to join the Sangha and become a nun. The Buddha initially refused her request. Eventually he relented, but in doing so he made conditions and a prediction that remain controversial to this day.

Pajapati was the sister of the Buddha's mother, Maya, who had died a few days after his birth. Maya and Pajapati were both married to his father, King Suddhodana, and after Maya's death Pajapati nursed and raised her sister's son.

Pajapati approached her stepson and asked to be received into the Sangha. The Buddha said no. Still determined, Pajapati and 500 women followers cut off their hair, dressed themselves in patched monk's robes, and set out on foot to follow the traveling Buddha.

When Pajapati and her followers caught up to the Buddha, they were exhausted. Ananda, the Buddha's cousin and most devoted attendant, found Pajapati in tears, dirty, her feet swollen. "Lady, why are you crying like this?" he asked.

She replied to Ananda that she wished to enter the Sangha and receive ordination, but the Buddha had refused her. Ananda promised to speak to the Buddha on her behalf.

The Buddha's Prediction

Ananda sat at the Buddha's side and argued on behalf of the ordination of women. The Buddha continued to refuse the request. Finally, Ananda asked if there was any reason women could not realize enlightenment and enter Nirvana as well as men.

The Buddha admitted there was no reason a woman could not be enlightened. "Women, Ananda, having gone forth are able to realize the fruit of stream-attainment or the fruit of once-returning or the fruit of non-returning or arahantship," he said.

Ananda had made his point, and the Buddha relented. Pajapati and her 500 followers would be the first Buddhist nuns. But he predicted that allowing women into the Sangha would cause his teachings to survive only half as long - 500 years instead of a 1,000.

Unequal Rules

Further, according to the canonical texts, before the Buddha allowed Pajapati into the Sangha, she had to agree to eight Garudhammas, or grave rules, not required of men. These are:

  • A Bhikkuni (nun) even if she was in the Order for 100 years must respect a Bhikkhu (monk) even of a day's standing.
  • A Bhikkuni must reside within 6 hours of traveling distance from the monastery where Bhikkhus reside for advice.
  • On Observance days a Bhikkhuni should consult the Bhikkhus.
  • A Bhikkhuni must spend rainy season retreats under the orders of both Bhikhus and Bhikkhunis.
  • A Bhikkhuni must live her life by both the orders.
  • A Bhikkhuni must on two years obtain the higher ordination (Upasampatha) by both Orders.
  • A Bhikkhuni cannot scold a Bhikkhu.
  • A Bhikkhuni cannot advise a Bhikkhu.

Nuns also have more rules to follow than monks. The Vinaya-pitaka lists about 250 rules for monks and 348 rules for nuns.

Historical Buddha, Misogynist?

The Rev. Patti Nakai of the Buddhist Temple of Chicago tells the story of the Buddha's stepmother and aunt, Prajapati. According to the Rev. Nakai, when Pajapati asked to join the Sangha and become a disciple, "Shakamuni's response was a declaration of the mental inferiority of women, saying they lacked the capacity to understand and practice the teachings of non-attachment to self." This is a version of the story I haven't found elsewhere.

The Rev. Nakai goes on to argue that the historical Buddha was, after all, a man of his time, and would have been conditioned to see women as inferior. However, Pajapati and the other nuns succeeded in breaking down the Buddha's misunderstanding.

"Shakamuni's sexist view had to have been completely eliminated by the time of the famous sutra stories of his encounters with women such as Kisa Gotami (in the tale of the mustard seed) and Queen Vaidehi (Meditation Sutra)," the Rev. Nakai writes. "In those stories, he would have failed to relate to them if he had held any prejudices against them as women."

Concern for the Sangha?

Many scholars argue that the Buddha was concerned that the rest of society, which supported the Sangha, would not approve of the ordination of nuns. Ordaining female disciples was a revolutionary step; there was nothing like it in the other religions of India at the time.

Or, the Buddha might have simply been protective of women, who faced great personal risk in a paternalistic culture when they were not under the protection of a father or husband.

Other scholars have suggested the Garudhammas were added to the canon later, after the Buddha's death, and were not in the original text. They point to discrepancies between the Pali Bhikkuni Vinaya (the section of the Pali Canon dealing with the rules for nuns) and other versions of the texts.

Consequences

Whatever their intention, the rules for nuns have been used to keep nuns in a subservient position. When the orders of nuns died out in India and Sri Lanka centuries ago, conservatives used the rules calling for nuns to be present at nuns' ordination to prevent the institution of new orders. Attempts to begin nuns orders in Tibet and Thailand, where there had been no nuns before, met with enormous resistance.

In recent years, the ordination problem has been solved by allowing properly authorized nuns from other parts of Asia to travel to ordination ceremonies. In America, several co-ed monastic orders have sprung up in which men and women take the same vows and live under the same rules.

And whatever his intentions, the Buddha was certainly wrong about one thing - his prediction about the survival of the teachings. It's been 25 centuries, and the teachings are still with us.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddhism and Evil

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Buddhism and Evil
Sep 27th 2012, 11:07

Evil is a word many people use without thinking deeply about what it signifies. I'd like to compare common ideas about evil with Buddhist teachings on evil, if for no other reason than to facilitate deeper thinking about evil.

First, a qualifier: This is a topic I've wrestled with for some time, and my understanding continues to change. This essay is a snapshot of what my understanding is right now, not perfect wisdom. If you have other perspectives you'd like to share, I encourage you to visit the Buddhism forums and leave a message.

Thinking About Evil

Over the years I've observed that people speak and think about evil in several different, and sometimes conflicting, ways. The two most common are these:

Evil as intrinsic characteristic. It's common to think of evil as an intrinsic characteristic of some people or groups. In other words, some people are said to be evil. Evil is a quality that is inherent in their being.

Evil as external force. In this view, evil lurks about and infects or seduces the unwary into doing bad things. Sometimes evil is personified as Satan or some other character from religious literature.

As I've said, these are common, popular ideas. You can find much more profound and nuanced ideas about evil in many philosophies and theologies, eastern and western. But for this essay I want to focus on Buddhist teachings and explain why Buddhism rejects both of these common ways of thinking about evil. Let's take them one at a time.

Evil as Characteristic

The act of sorting humanity into "good" and "evil" carries a terrible trap. When other people are thought to be evil, it becomes possible to justify doing them harm. And in that thinking are seeds of genuine evil.

Human history is thoroughly saturated by violence and atrocity committed on behalf of "good" against people categorized as "evil." I dare say most of the mass horrors humanity has inflicted upon itself have come from this kind of thinking. People intoxicated by their own self-righteousness or who believe in their own intrinsic moral superiority too easily give themselves permission to do terrible things to those they hate or fear.

Sorting people into separate divisions and categories is very un-Buddhist. The Buddha's teaching of the Four Noble Truths tells us that suffering is caused by greed, or thirst, but also that greed is rooted in the delusion of an isolated, separate self.

Closely related to this is the teaching of dependent origination, which says that everything and everyone is a web of interconnection, and every part of the web expresses and reflects every other part of the web.

And also closely related is the Mahayana teaching of shunyata, "emptiness." If we are empty of intrinsic being, how can we be intrinsically anything? There is no-self for intrinsic qualities to stick to.

For this reason, a Buddhist is strongly advised not to fall into the habit of thinking of himself and others as intrinsically good or bad. Ultimately there is just action and reaction; cause and effect. And this takes us to karma, which I will come back to shortly.

Evil as External Force

Some religions teach that evil is a force outside ourselves that seduces us into sin. This force is sometimes thought to be generated by Satan or various demons. The faithful are encouraged to seek strength outside themselves to fight evil, by looking to God.

The Buddha's teaching could not be more different --

"By oneself, indeed, is evil done; by oneself is one defiled. By oneself is evil left undone; by oneself, indeed, is one purified. Purity and impurity depend on oneself. No one purifies another." (Dhammapada, chapter 12, verse 165)

Buddhism teaches us that evil is something we create, not something we are or some outside force that infects us.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions