Monday, 30 September 2013

Buddhism: Stuck in the Void

Buddhism
Get the latest headlines from the Buddhism GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Decode Your Dreams

Anyone can learn to understand their dreams - even you! You'll have step by step instructions including templates. All you need is a dream. Enroll today for $79.
From our sponsors
Stuck in the Void
Sep 30th 2013, 21:43

I've written a review of  Nothing Is Hidden: The Psychology of Zen Koans, a new book by Zen teacher Barry Magid. I recommend this book highly to anyone already engaged in Zen practice, Soto or Rinzai. But I think a lot of what it says applies to other schools of Buddhism as well.

Part of the book looks at the question of "how good teachers do bad things," or how teachers recognized for their insight can turn around and exploit students. This isn't a problem limited to Zen, of course.

However, speaking specifically of Zen, it's possible for a student to take a slam-bang nose dive straight into sunyata that leaves his inner demons/neuroses/issues unexamined and untouched. This is certainly not inevitable, and  teachers I have known have all explicitly warned us students not to let this happen. But I know it does happen.

This is explained as being stuck in emptiness. The student experiences the ephemeral nature of self and the inter-existence of beings, but the heart of compassion does not open. Of course, the way it's supposed to work is that realization of sunyata, the perfection of wisdom, naturally gives rise to compassion. I still trust that it does. But maybe there are realizations off-center from perfect that don't quite do the job. Magid writes,

"Not only did realization fail to heal the deep divisions in our character, more and more it looked as if for many people, and in particular for many Zen teachers, practice opened up bigger and bigger splits between an idealized compassionate self and a shadow self, where split off and denied sexual, competitive, and narcissistic fantasies held sway."

I should mention that Barry Magid is an honest-to-gosh psychoanalyst as well as a dharma heir of the late Charlotte Joko Beck. Normally articles and books blending Buddhism and psychology strike me as glib and superficial, but here is an author who understands both disciplines deeply. A lot of what he says rings true for me. Comments?

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The First Buddhist Nuns

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Curious about the benefits of meditation?

In just a few minutes daily, this course will teach you how to relax and relieve stress. Even with a full schedule, you will want to make time for this!
From our sponsors
The First Buddhist Nuns
Sep 30th 2013, 11:03, by buddhism.guide@about.com

The historical Buddha's most famous statements on women came about when his stepmother and aunt, Maha Pajapati Gotami, asked to join the Sangha and become a nun. The Buddha initially refused her request. Eventually he relented, but in doing so he made conditions and a prediction that remain controversial to this day.

Pajapati was the sister of the Buddha's mother, Maya, who had died a few days after his birth. Maya and Pajapati were both married to his father, King Suddhodana, and after Maya's death Pajapati nursed and raised her sister's son.

Pajapati approached her stepson and asked to be received into the Sangha. The Buddha said no. Still determined, Pajapati and 500 women followers cut off their hair, dressed themselves in patched monk's robes, and set out on foot to follow the traveling Buddha.

When Pajapati and her followers caught up to the Buddha, they were exhausted. Ananda, the Buddha's cousin and most devoted attendant, found Pajapati in tears, dirty, her feet swollen. "Lady, why are you crying like this?" he asked.

She replied to Ananda that she wished to enter the Sangha and receive ordination, but the Buddha had refused her. Ananda promised to speak to the Buddha on her behalf.

The Buddha's Prediction

Ananda sat at the Buddha's side and argued on behalf of the ordination of women. The Buddha continued to refuse the request. Finally, Ananda asked if there was any reason women could not realize enlightenment and enter Nirvana as well as men.

The Buddha admitted there was no reason a woman could not be enlightened. "Women, Ananda, having gone forth are able to realize the fruit of stream-attainment or the fruit of once-returning or the fruit of non-returning or arahantship," he said.

Ananda had made his point, and the Buddha relented. Pajapati and her 500 followers would be the first Buddhist nuns. But he predicted that allowing women into the Sangha would cause his teachings to survive only half as long - 500 years instead of a 1,000.

Unequal Rules

Further, according to the canonical texts, before the Buddha allowed Pajapati into the Sangha, she had to agree to eight Garudhammas, or grave rules, not required of men. These are:

  • A Bhikkuni (nun) even if she was in the Order for 100 years must respect a Bhikkhu (monk) even of a day's standing.
  • A Bhikkuni must reside within 6 hours of traveling distance from the monastery where Bhikkhus reside for advice.
  • On Observance days a Bhikkhuni should consult the Bhikkhus.
  • A Bhikkhuni must spend rainy season retreats under the orders of both Bhikhus and Bhikkhunis.
  • A Bhikkhuni must live her life by both the orders.
  • A Bhikkhuni must on two years obtain the higher ordination (Upasampatha) by both Orders.
  • A Bhikkhuni cannot scold a Bhikkhu.
  • A Bhikkhuni cannot advise a Bhikkhu.

Nuns also have more rules to follow than monks. The Vinaya-pitaka lists about 250 rules for monks and 348 rules for nuns.

Historical Buddha, Misogynist?

The Rev. Patti Nakai of the Buddhist Temple of Chicago tells the story of the Buddha's stepmother and aunt, Prajapati. According to the Rev. Nakai, when Pajapati asked to join the Sangha and become a disciple, "Shakamuni's response was a declaration of the mental inferiority of women, saying they lacked the capacity to understand and practice the teachings of non-attachment to self." This is a version of the story I haven't found elsewhere.

The Rev. Nakai goes on to argue that the historical Buddha was, after all, a man of his time, and would have been conditioned to see women as inferior. However, Pajapati and the other nuns succeeded in breaking down the Buddha's misunderstanding.

"Shakamuni's sexist view had to have been completely eliminated by the time of the famous sutra stories of his encounters with women such as Kisa Gotami (in the tale of the mustard seed) and Queen Vaidehi (Meditation Sutra)," the Rev. Nakai writes. "In those stories, he would have failed to relate to them if he had held any prejudices against them as women."

Concern for the Sangha?

Many scholars argue that the Buddha was concerned that the rest of society, which supported the Sangha, would not approve of the ordination of nuns. Ordaining female disciples was a revolutionary step; there was nothing like it in the other religions of India at the time.

Or, the Buddha might have simply been protective of women, who faced great personal risk in a paternalistic culture when they were not under the protection of a father or husband.

Other scholars have suggested the Garudhammas were added to the canon later, after the Buddha's death, and were not in the original text. They point to discrepancies between the Pali Bhikkuni Vinaya (the section of the Pali Canon dealing with the rules for nuns) and other versions of the texts.

Consequences

Whatever their intention, the rules for nuns have been used to keep nuns in a subservient position. When the orders of nuns died out in India and Sri Lanka centuries ago, conservatives used the rules calling for nuns to be present at nuns' ordination to prevent the institution of new orders. Attempts to begin nuns orders in Tibet and Thailand, where there had been no nuns before, met with enormous resistance.

In recent years, the ordination problem has been solved by allowing properly authorized nuns from other parts of Asia to travel to ordination ceremonies. In America, several co-ed monastic orders have sprung up in which men and women take the same vows and live under the same rules.

And whatever his intentions, the Buddha was certainly wrong about one thing - his prediction about the survival of the teachings. It's been 25 centuries, and the teachings are still with us.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Finding Your Teacher

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Manage your social media

Best social media tool for image publishing to Facebook and Twitter. Look amazing and delight your followers. Get 40% off when you sign up today.
From our sponsors
Finding Your Teacher
Sep 30th 2013, 11:03, by buddhism.guide@about.com

The first step in finding a Buddhist teacher is clarifying why you need one. A teacher cannot give you the life you want or make you the person you want to be. A teacher cannot take your pain away and give you enlightenment. If you are looking for someone who can correct your flaws for you and make you happy, you're in the wrong religion.

So, why do you need a teacher? I've met many people who insist they don't need one, never needed one, and have no intention of seeking one. After all, the Buddha taught --

By oneself is evil done; by oneself is one defiled. By oneself is evil left undone; by oneself is one made pure. Purity and impurity depended on oneself; no one can purify another. (Dhammapada XII, verse 165)

But as Ken McLeod wrote in Wake Up to Your Life: Discovering the Buddhist Path of Attention (HarperSanFrancisco, 2001), "When we start exploring the mystery of being, we are still mired in habituated patterns. Limited in perception to a world projected by these patterns, we do not and cannot see things as they are. We need a person, a teacher, who, standing outside our projected world, can show us how to proceed."

Ego Is Not a Good Teacher

My first teacher used to say that his entire function was pulling rugs out from under people. He'd see a student grow complacent or settle into new conceptual patterns, and riiiiip.

If your understanding is never challenged you can spend years fooling yourself. I can't tell you how many times I've gone into the interview room thinking I knew something. But when challenged, what my ego told me was great insight vanished like smoke in the breeze. On the other hand, when realization is genuine, a teacher can guide you to deeper realization.

Remember, you are not likely to see through the illusion of ego by protecting your ego.

True and False Teachers

How do you know which teachers are for real and which are phonies? Many schools of Buddhism place great importance on lineage -- the teacher's teacher, the teacher's teacher's teacher, and so on, going back generations. Most schools of Buddhism only recognize teachers who have been authorized to teach either by that school's institutions or by another authorized teacher.

It's true that such authorization is no guarantee of quality. And not all unauthorized teachers are charlatans. But I would be very cautious about working with anyone who calls himself a "Buddhist" teacher but who has no association whatsoever with a recognized Buddhist lineage or institution. Such a teacher is almost certainly a fraud.

A few tips: Only the phonies claim to be "fully enlightened." Beware of teachers who ooze charisma and are worshiped by their students. The best teachers are the most ordinary ones. The true teachers are those who say they have nothing to give you.

No Students, No Teachers

It's common to develop an attitude about authority figures, usually because of bad experiences with them. When I was younger I was easily intimidated by authority figures, including teachers.

But remember the Madhyamika teaching -- things have identity only in relation to each other. Students create teachers. Followers create leaders. Children create parents. And vice versa, of course. No person is, in fact, an authority figure. "Authority figure" is a relationship construct that is caused to manifest by "submissive figure." It is not anyone's intrinsic identity.

When I began to see that, I became less fearful of authority figures. Certainly in many situations -- employment, the military -- one cannot exactly blow off the authority figure illusion without consequences. But seeing through dualistic delusions -- such as authority figure/submissive figure -- is an essential part of the Buddhist path. And you can't very well resolve an issue by avoiding it.

Also, in the case of working with a Buddhist teacher, if you feel something's wrong, you can always walk away. I've yet to hear of a genuine teacher who would try to hang onto or control a student who wished to leave.

But keep in mind that the spiritual path goes through our wounds, not around them or away from them. Don't let discomfort hold you back.

Finding Your Teacher

Once you decide to find a teacher, how do you find a teacher? If there are any Buddhist centers near where you live, start there. Studying year-round with a teacher within a community of Buddhists is ideal. The famous teacher whose books you admire may not be the best teacher for you if you can only travel to see her occasionally.

Consider that karma put you where you are. Begin by working with that. You don't have to go out of the way to find your path; it's already beneath your feet. Just walk.

If you find you do need to widen your search, I suggest starting with BuddhaNet's Online World Buddhist Directory. This is in a searchable database format. The database lists Buddhist centers and organizations in Africa, Asia, Central America, Europe, the Middle East, North America, Oceania and South America.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Taking Refuge: Becoming a Buddhist

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Want to speak effortlessly in any situation?

Actress Alexa Fisher will teach you tips that will set you on the road to success.
From our sponsors
Taking Refuge: Becoming a Buddhist
Sep 30th 2013, 11:03, by buddhism.guide@about.com

To become a Buddhist is to take refuge in the Three Jewels, also called the Three Treasures. The Three Jewels are the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Sangha.

The formal ceremony of Ti Samana Gamana (Pali), or "taking the three refuges," is performed in nearly all schools of Buddhism. However, anyone who sincerely wants to follow the Buddha's path may begin that commitment by reciting these lines:

I take refuge in the Buddha.
I take refuge in the Dharma.
I take refuge in the Sangha.

The English word refuge refers to a place of shelter and protection from danger. What danger? We seek shelter from the passions that jerk us around, from feeling distressed and broken, from pain and suffering, from the fear of death. We seek shelter from the wheel of samsara, the cycle of death and rebirth.

Taking Refuge

The meaning of taking refuge in the Three Jewels is explained somewhat differently by the various schools of Buddhism. The Theravada teacher Bhikkhu Bodhi said,

"The Buddha's teaching can be thought of as a kind of building with its own distinct foundation, stories, stairs, and roof. Like any other building the teaching also has a door, and in order to enter it we have to enter through this door. The door of entrance to the teaching of the Buddha is the going for refuge to the Triple Gem â€" that is, to the Buddha as the fully enlightened teacher, to the Dhamma as the truth taught by him, and to the Sangha as the community of his noble disciples."

In his book Taking the Path of Zen, Zen teacher Robert Aitken wrote that taking refuge in the Three Jewels more of a vow than a prayer. The original Pali words of the three "I take refuge" lines, translated literally, read "I will undertake to find my home in the Buddha," and then the Dharma and Sangha. "The implication is that by finding my home in the Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha I can free myself from blind conditioning and realize true nature," Aitken writes.

No Magic

Taking the refuges will not summon supernatural spirits to come and save you. The power of the vow comes from your own sincerity and commitment. Robert Thurman, a Tibetan Buddhist and Professor of Indo-Tibetan Buddhist studies at Columbia University, said of the Three Jewels,

"Remember that awakening, freedom from suffering, salvation, if you will, liberation, omniscience, buddhahood, all come from your own understanding, your insight into your own reality. It cannot come just from the blessing of another, from some magical empowerment, from some sort of secret gimmick, or from membership in a group."

Ch'an Master Sheng-Yen said, "The genuine Three Jewels, in essence, are none other than the enlightened Buddha nature that is already inside you."

"Taking refuge in the Buddha, we learn to transform anger into compassion; taking refuge in the Dharma, we learn to transform delusion into wisdom; taking refuge in the Sangha, we learn to transform desire into generosity." (Red Pine, The Heart Sutra: The Womb of Buddhas, p. 132)

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Sunday, 29 September 2013

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Padmasambhava

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Padmasambhava
Sep 29th 2013, 11:02, by buddhism.guide@about.com

Padmasambhava was an 8th-century master of Buddhist tantra who is credited with bring Vajrayana to Tibet and Bhutan. He is revered today as one of the great patriarchs of Tibetan Buddhism and the founder of the Nyinmapa school. In Tibetan iconography he is the embodiment of the dharmakaya. He is sometimes called "Guru Rinpoche," or precious guru.

Padmasambhava may have been from Uddiyana, which was situated in what is now the Swat Valley of northern Pakistan (see also "The Lost World of Buddhist Gandhara"). He was brought to Tibet during the reign of the Emperor Trisong Detsen, (742-797). He is associated with the building of the first Buddhist monastery in Tibet, Samye Gompa.

Padmasambhava in History

The historical narrative of Padmasambhava's life begins with another Buddhist master named Shantarakshita. Shantarakshita came from Nepal at the invitation of Emperor Trisong Detsen, who was interested in Buddhism. Unfortunately, Tibetans worried that Shantarakshita practiced black magic, and he was kept in detention for a few months. Further, no one spoke his language. Months passed before a translator was found.

Eventually Shantarakshita gained the Emperor's trust and was allowed to teach. Some time after that, the Emperor announced plans to build a grand monastery. But a series of natural disasters -- flooded temples, castles struck by lightning -- stirred Tibetans' fears their local gods were angry about the plans for the temple. The Emperor sent Shantarakshita back to Nepal.

Some time passed, and the disasters were forgotten. The Emperor asked Shantarakshita to return. But this time Shantarakshita brought another guru with him -- Padmasambhava, who was a master of rituals to tame demons.

Early accounts say Padmasambhava divined which demons were causing the problems, and one by one he called them forth by name. He threatened each demon, and Shantarakshita -- through a translator -- taught them about karma. When he was finished, Padmasambhava informed the Emperor that building of his monastery could begin.

However, Padmasambhava was still viewed with suspicion by many at Trisong Detsen's court. Rumors circulated that he would use magic to seize power and depose the Emperor. Eventually the Emperor was worried enough that he suggested Padmasambhava might leave Tibet.

Padmasambhava was angry, but agreed to leave. The Emperor was still worried, so he sent archers after Padmasambhava to put an end to him. Legends say Padmasambhava used magic to freeze his assassins, and so escaped.

Padmasambhava in Tibetan Mythology

As time passed, Padmasambhava's legend grew. The full account of Padmasambhava's iconic and mythological role in Tibetan Buddhism would fill volumes, and there are stories and legends about him beyond counting. Here is a very abridged version of Padmasambhava's mythic story.

Padmasambhava -- whose name means "born of the lotus" -- was born a the age of eight from a flowering lotus in Dhanakosha lake in Uddiyana. He was adopted by the king of Uddiyana. In adulthood he was driven from Uddiyana by evil spirits.

Eventually he came to Bodh Gaya, the place where the historical Buddha realized enlightenment, and was was ordained a monk. He studied at the great Buddhist university at Nalanda in India, and he was mentored by many significant teachers and spiritual guides.

He went to the Cima Valley and became the disciple of a great yogi named Sri Simha, and received tantric empowerments and teachings. Then he went to the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal, where he lived in a cave with the first of his consorts, Mandarava (also called Sukhavati). While there, the couple received texts on Vajrakilaya, an important tantric practice. Through Vajrakilaya, Padmasambhava and Mandarava realized great enlightenment.

Padmasambhava became a renowned teacher, and on many occasions he performed miracles that brought demons under control. This ability eventually took him to Tibet, to cleanse the site of the Emperor's monastery from demons. The demons -- the gods of indigenous Tibetan religion -- were converted to Buddhism and became dharmapalas, or protectors of the dharma.

Once the demons were pacified, the building of Tibet's first monastery could be completed. The first monks of this monastery, Samye, were the first monks of Nyingmapa Buddhism.

Padmasambhava returned to Nepal, but seven years later he came back to Tibet. The Emperor Trisong Detsen was so overjoyed to see Padmasambhava he offered Padmasambhava all the wealth of Tibet. The tantric master refused these gifts. But he did accept a lady from the Emperor's harem, the princess Yeshe Tsogyal, as his second consort, provided the princess accept the relationship of her free will.

Together with Yeshe Tsogyal, Padmasambhava hid a number of mystic texts (terma) in Tibet and elsewhere. Terma are found when disciples are ready to understand them. One terma is the Bardo Thodol, known in English as the "Tibetan Book of the Dead." Yeshe Tsogyal became Padmasambhava's dharma heir, and she transmitted the Dzogchen teachings to her disciples. Padmasambhava had three other consorts, and the five women are called the Five Wisdom Dakinis.

The year after Tri-song Detsan died, Padmasambhava left Tibet for the last time. He dwells in spirit in a pure Buddha-field, Akanishta.

In Tibetan art, Padmasambhava is depicted in eight aspects:

  • Pema Gyalpo (Padmaraja) of Uddiyana, the Lotus Prince. He is depicted as a young prince..
  • Lo-den Chokse (Sthiramati) of Kashmir, the Intelligent Youth, beats a drum and holds a skull bowl.
  • Sakya-seng-ge (Bhikshu Sakyasimha) of Bodh Gaya, Lion of the Sakyas, is portrayed as an ordained monk.
  • Nyima O-zer (Suryabhasa) of Cina, the Sunray Yogi, wears only a loincloth and holds a trident pointing to the sun.
  • Seng-ge Dra-dok (Vadisimha) of Nalanda University, the Lion of Debate. He is usually dark blue and holds a dorje in one hand and a scopion in the other.
  • Pema Jung-ne (Padmasambhava) of Zahor, the Lotus-born, wears monks' robes and holds a skull bowl.
  • Pemakara of Tibet, Lotus-creator, sits on a lotus, wearing Tibetan monk's robes and Tibetan boots. He holds a vajra in his right hand and a skull bowl in his left. He has a trident staff and a Nepalese cloth crown.
  • Dorje Dro-lo of Bhutan is a wrathful manifestation known as "Diamond Guts."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Saturday, 28 September 2013

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddhist Scriptures: An Overview

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Buddhist Scriptures: An Overview
Sep 28th 2013, 11:02, by buddhism.guide@about.com

Is there a Buddhist Bible? Not exactly. Buddhism has a vast number of scriptures, but no one text is accepted as authentic and authoritative by every school of Buddhism. Instead, each school of Buddhism has its own ideas about which scriptures are important.

There is one other reason that there is no Buddhist Bible. Many religions consider their scriptures to be the revealed word of God or gods. In Buddhism, however, it is understood that the scriptures are teachings of the historical Buddha -- a human being -- or other enlightened masters.

The teachings in Buddhist scriptures are directions for practice, or how to realize enlightenment for oneself. What's important is to understand and practice what the texts are teaching, not just "believe in" them.

Types of Buddhist Scripture

Many scriptures are called "sutras" in Sanskrit or "sutta" in Pali. The word sutra or sutta means "thread." The word "sutra" in the title of a text indicates the work is a sermon of the Buddha or one of his major disciples. However, as I will explain later, many sutras probably have other origins.

Sutras come in many sizes. Some are book length, some are only a few lines. No one seems willing to guess how many sutras there might be if you piled every individual one from every canon and collection into a pile. A lot.

Not all scriptures are sutras. For example, the rules of the monastic orders are recorded in a text called the Vinaya-pitaka. There is also a text called the Abhidharma (Sanskrit) or Abhidhamma (Pali), of which there is more than one version. The Abhidharma is a work of analysis or philosophy rather than a sermon, so it isn't called a "sutra."

Theravada and Mahayana Canons

About two millennia ago, Buddhism split into two major schools, called today Theravada and Mahayana. Buddhist scriptures are associated with one or the other, divided into Theravada and Mahayana canons.

Theravadins do not consider the Mahayana scriptures to be authentic. Mahayana Buddhists on the whole consider the Theravada canon to be authentic, but in some cases Mahayana Buddhists think some of their scriptures have superseded the Theravada canon in authority.

To add to the confusion, schools of Mahayana Buddhism have different views about which Mahayana scriptures are authentic and authoritative. Some Mahayana scriptures are important to some schools and ignored by others. For example, the Lotus Sutra is the only scripture accepted by the Nichiren school, but it plays no part in Tibetan Buddhism.

Theravada Buddhist Scriptures

The scriptures of the Theravada school are collected in a work called the Tipitaka (or Tripitaka in Sanskrit). The Pali word Tipitaka means "three baskets," which indicates the Tipitaka is divided into three parts, and each part is a collection of works. The three sections are the basket of sutras (Sutra-pitaka), the basket of discipline (Vinaya-pitaka), and the basket of special teachings (Abhidharma-pitaka).

As I mentioned earlier in this article, the Vinaya gives the rules for the orders of nuns and monks, and the Abdhidharma provides analysis of the sutras but is not a sutra (sermon) itself.

The most complete and most common version of the Tipitaka is in the Pali language. This Pali Tipitaka, also called the Pali Canon, contains the scriptures followed by Theravada Buddhism. The Pali Canon is thought to be the words of the historical Buddha and some of his disciples, preserved for a time by oral tradition and then written down in the 1st century BCE. For a more complete explanation of the origins of the Tipitaka, please see "The Pali Canon: The First Buddhist Scriptures."

There are ancient versions of parts of the Tipitaka in other languages. For example, there are sutras in Sanskrit that correspond to some of the sutras in the Pali Sutra-pitaka, and the collection of these early discourses is called the Agamas.

There also have been versions of the Abhidharma that are considerably different from the one in the Pali Canon. Some of these exist today only in fragments. But one, called the Sarvastivada Abhidharma, is still intact. Saravastivada was an early sect of Buddhism that emerged in the 3rd century BCE.

Mahayana Buddhist Scriptures

Although there are myths and stories that associate each of the Mahayana sutras to the historical Buddha, historians tell us the works were mostly written between the 1st century BCE and the 5th century CE, and a few even later than that. For the most part, the provenance and authorship of these texts are unknown.

The mysterious origins of these works give rise to questions about their authority. As I've said Theravada Buddhists disregard the Mahayana scriptures entirely. Among Mahayana Buddhist schools, some continue to associate the Mahayana sutras with the historical Buddha. Others acknowledge that these scriptures were written by unknown authors. But because the deep wisdom and spiritual value of these texts have been apparent to so many generations, they are preserved and revered as sutras anyway.

Many of the Mahyana sutras are thought to have been originally written in Sanskrit, but the oldest extant versions are Chinese translations, and the original Sanskrit is lost. Some scholars, however, argue that the first Chinese translations are, in fact, the original versions, and their authors claimed to have translated them from Sanskrit to give them more authority.

Within the Mahayana canon are many sub-canons. For example, the Prajnaparamita (perfection of wisdom) Sutra is a collection of about forty sutras, some very long, other very brief. The Heart Sutra is one of these. Because their central theme is prajna, wisdom, scholars sometimes call them the "wisdom literature."

Some Mahayana Sutras are unique to a particular school. For example, there are three "Pure Land" sutras that are the main scriptures of Pure Land Buddhism but which are not much used by other schools. Others, like the Lotus, are revered by several schools of Mahayana Buddhism but not all of them.

This list of major Mahayana Sutras is not comprehensive but provides brief explanations of the most important Mahayana sutras.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: The Wheel of Life: The Hell Realm

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
The Wheel of Life: The Hell Realm
Sep 28th 2013, 11:02, by buddhism.guide@about.com

The Hell Realm is depicted as a place partly of fire and partly of ice. In the fiery part of the realm, Hell Beings (Narakas) are subjected to pain and torment. In the icy part, they are frozen.

Interpreted psychologically, Hell Beings are recognized by their acute aggression. Fiery Hell Beings are angry and abusive, and they drive away anyone who would befriend or love them. Icy Hell Beings shove others away with their unfeeling coldness. Then, in the torment of their isolation, their aggression increasingly turns inward, and they become self-destructive.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Friday, 27 September 2013

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddhism, Abortion, and the Problem of Moral...

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Manage your social media

Best social media tool for image publishing to Facebook and Twitter. Look amazing and delight your followers. Get 40% off when you sign up today.
From our sponsors
Buddhism, Abortion, and the Problem of Moral...
Sep 27th 2013, 11:02, by buddhism.guide@about.com

(This is the second part of an essay on Buddhist Views of Abortion. Click "Continued from Page 1" to read the first part.)

The Buddhist Approach to Morality

Buddhism does not approach morality by handing out absolute rules to be followed in all circumstances. Instead, it provides guidance to help us see how what we do affects ourselves and others. The karma we create with our thoughts, words and actions keeps us subject to cause and effect. Thus, we assume responsibility for our actions and the results of our actions. Even the Precepts are not commandments, but princples, and it is up to us to decide how to apply those principles to our lives.

Karma Lekshe Tsomo, a professor of theology and a nun in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, explains,

"There are no moral absolutes in Buddhism and it is recognized that ethical decision-making involves a complex nexus of causes and conditions. 'Buddhism' encompasses a wide spectrum of beliefs and practices, and the canonical scriptures leave room for a range of interpretations. All of these are grounded in a theory of intentionality, and individuals are encouraged to analyze issues carefully for themselves. ... When making moral choices, individuals are advised to examine their motivation--whether aversion, attachment, ignorance, wisdom, or compassion--and to weigh the consequences of their actions in light of the Buddha's teachings."

What's Wrong With Moral Absolutes?

Our culture places great value on something called "moral clarity." Moral clarity rarely is defined, but I infer it means ignoring the messier aspects of complex moral issues so that one can apply simple, rigid rules to solving them. If you take all facets of an issue into account, you risk not being clear.

Moral clarifiers love to rework all ethical problems into simple equations of right and wrong, good and bad. There is an assumption that an issue can have only two sides, and that one side must be entirely right and the other side entirely wrong. Complex issues are simplified and oversimplified and stripped of all ambiguous aspects to make them fit into "right" and "wrong" boxes.

To a Buddhist, this is a dishonest and unskillful way to approach morality.

In the case of abortion, often people who have taken a side glibly dismiss the concerns of any other side. For example, in much anti-abortion literature women who have abortions are portrayed as selfish or thoughtless, or sometimes just plain evil. The very real problems an unwanted pregnancy might bring to a woman's life are not honestly acknowledged. Moralists sometimes discuss embryos, pregnancy and abortion without mentioning women at all. At the same time, those who favor legal abortion sometimes fail to acknowledge the humanity of the fetus.

The Fruits of Absolutism

Although Buddhism discourages abortion, we see that criminalizing abortion causes much suffering. The Alan Guttmacher Institute documents that criminalizing abortion does not stop it or even reduce it. Instead, abortion goes underground and is performed in unsafe conditions.

In desperation, women submit to unsterile procedures. They drink bleach or turpentine, perforate themselves with sticks and coat hangers, and even jump off roofs. Worldwide, unsafe abortion procedures cause the deaths of about 67,000 women per year, mostly in nations in which abortion is illegal.

Those with "moral clarity" can ignore this suffering. A Buddhist cannot. In his book The Mind of Clover: Essays in Zen Buddhist Ethics, Robert Aitken Roshi said (p.17), "The absolute position, when isolated, omits human details completely. Doctrines, including Buddhism, are meant to be used. Beware of them taking life of their own, for then they use us."

What About the Baby?

My understanding is that an individual is a phenomenon of life in the same way a wave is a phenomenon of ocean. When the wave begins, nothing is added to the ocean; when it ends, nothing is taken away.

Robert Aitken Roshi wrote (The Mind of Clover, pp. 21-22),

"Sorrow and suffering form the nature of samsara, the flow of life and death, and the decision to prevent birth is made on balance with other elements of suffering. Once the decision is made, there is no blame, but rather acknowledgment that sadness pervades the whole universe, and this bit of life goes with our deepest love."

The Buddhist Approach

In researching this article I found universal consensus among Buddhist ethicists that the best approach to the abortion issue is to educate people about birth control and encourage them to use contraceptives. Beyond that, as Karma Lekshe Tsomo writes,

"In the end, most Buddhists recognize the incongruity that exists between ethical theory and actual practice and, while they do not condone the taking of life, do advocate understanding and compassion toward all living beings, a lovingkindness that is nonjudgmental and respects the right and freedom of human beings to make their own choices."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: War and Buddhism

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Manage your social media

Best social media tool for image publishing to Facebook and Twitter. Look amazing and delight your followers. Get 40% off when you sign up today.
From our sponsors
War and Buddhism
Sep 27th 2013, 11:02, by buddhism.guide@about.com

To Buddhists, war is akusala -- unskillful, evil. Yet Buddhists sometimes fight in wars. Is war always wrong? Is there such a thing as a "just war" theory in Buddhism?

Buddhists at War

Buddhist scholars say there is no justification for war in Buddhist teaching. Yet Buddhism has not always separated itself from war. There is historic documentation that in 621 CE monks from the Shaolin Temple of China fought in a battle that helped establish the Tang Dynasty. In centuries past, the heads of Tibetan Buddhist schools formed strategic alliances with Mongol warlords and reaped benefits from the warlords' victories.

The links between Zen Buddhism and samurai warrior culture were partly responsible for the shocking collusion of Zen and Japanese militarism in the 1930s and 1940s. For several years a virulent jingoism seized Japanese Zen, and teachings were twisted and corrupted to excuse killing. Zen institutions not only supported Japanese military aggression but raised money to manufacture war planes and weapons.

Observed from a distance of time and culture, these actions and ideas are inexcusable corruptions of dharma, and any "just war" theory that arose from them were the products of delusion. This episode serves as a lesson to us not to be swept up in the passions of the cultures we live in. Of course, in volatile times that is easier said than done.

In recent years Buddhist monks have been leaders of political and social activism in Asia. The Saffron Revolution in Burma and the March 2008 demonstrations in Tibet are the most prominent examples. Most of these monks are committed to nonviolence, although there are always exceptions. More troubling are the monks of Sri Lanka who lead the Jathika Hela Urumaya, "National Heritage Party," a strongly nationalist group that advocates a military solution to Sri Lanka's ongoing civil war.

Is War Always Wrong?

Buddhism challenges us to look beyond a simple right/wrong dichotomy. In Buddhism, an act that sows the seeds of harmful karma is regrettable even if it unavoidable. Sometimes Buddhists fight to defend their nations, home and family. This is not "wrong." Yet even in these circumstances, to harbor hate for one's enemies is still a poison. And any act of war that sows the seeds of future harmful karma is still akusala.

Buddhist morality is based on principles, not rules. Our principles are those expressed in the Precepts and the Four Immeasurables -- loving kindness, compassion, sympathetic joy and equanimity. Our principles also are kindness, gentleness, mercy and tolerance. Even the most extreme circumstances do not erase those principles or make it "righteous" or "good" to violate them.

Yet neither is it "good" or "righteous" to stand aside while innocent people are slaughtered. And the late Ven. Dr. K Sri Dhammananda, a Theravadin monks and scholar, said, "The Buddha did not teach His followers to surrender to any form of evil power be it a human or supernatural being."

To Fight or Not to Fight

In "What Buddhist Believe," the Venerable Dhammananda wrote,

"Buddhists should not be the aggressors even in protecting their religion or anything else. They must try their best to avoid any kind of violent act. Sometimes they may be forced to go to war by others who do not respect the concept of the brotherhood of humans as taught by the Buddha. They may be called upon to defend their country from external aggression, and as long as they have not renounced the worldly life, they are duty-bound to join in the struggle for peace and freedom. Under these circumstances, they cannot be blamed for becoming soldiers or being involved in defence. However, if everyone were to follow the advice of the Buddha, there would be no reason for war to take place in this world. It is the duty of every cultured person to find all possible ways and means to settle disputes in a peaceful manner, without declaring war to kill his or her fellow human beings."

As always in questions of morality, when choosing whether to fight or not to fight a Buddhist must examine his own motivations honestly. It is too easy and too common to rationalize one has pure motives when in fact one is fearful and angry. For most of us self-honesty on this level takes extraordinary effort and maturity, and history tells us that even senior priests with years of practice can lie to themselves.

Love Your Enemy

We are called upon also to extend loving kindness and compassion to our enemies, even when facing them on a battlefield. That's not possible, you say. Maybe it isn't; I can't say I've ever tried it myself. Yet this is our path.

However, over the years I've met people who seem to think that one is obligated to hate one's enemies. I hear them say how can you speak well of someone who hates you? Well, if people want to hate me that's their business, but I can choose not to hate them back. And if you have to fight someone, then fight. But hate is extra.

So often in human history, war has sewn seeds that ripened into the next war. And often, the battles themselves were less responsible for evil karma than the way occupying armies treated civilians, or the way the victor humiliated and oppressed the conquered. At the very least, when it is time to stop fighting, stop fighting. History shows us that the victor who treats the conquered with magnanimity, mercy and leniency is more likely to achieve the lasting victory and eventual peace.

Buddhists in the Military

Today there are more than 3,000 Buddhists serving in the U.S. armed forces, including some Buddhist chaplains. Today's Buddhist soldiers and sailors are not the first in the U.S. military. During World War II, approximately half of the troops in Japanese-American units such as the 100th Battalion and the 442nd Infantry were Buddhists.

In the Spring 2008 issue of Tricycle, Travis Duncan wrote of the Vast Refuge Dharma Hall Chapel at the U.S. Air Force Academy. There are 26 cadets currently at the academy who practice Buddhism.

At the dedication of the chapel, the Reverend Dai En Wiley Burch of the Hollow Bones Rinzai Zen school said, "Without compassion, war is a criminal activity. Sometimes it is necessary to take life, but we never take life for granted."

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Beginner Zen Books

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Want free Kindle ebooks?

Sign up to receive the best freebie Kindle ebook deals in your email every day.
From our sponsors
Beginner Zen Books
Sep 27th 2013, 11:02, by buddhism.guide@about.com

There are truckloads of books about Zen, but many assume the reader already knows something about Zen. And, unfortunately, many other were written by people who don't know something about Zen. If you are a genuine beginner and don't know a zabuton from zucchini, here are some books for you.

1. The Miracle of Mindfulness, by Thich Nhat Hanh

The Miracle of Mindfulness

Strictly speaking, this little book by the Vietnamese Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh is not about Zen. It's more of an introduction to mindfulness and Mahayana. But in the West, this seems to be the book that everyone reads before they show up at the Zen center.

I read a review of A Miracle of Mindfulness that said it was not about Buddhism. It is; it's just written in such a way that non-Buddhist readers might not recognize that it's about Buddhism. Certainly it's a book that can be appreciated by non-Buddhists. But for me, it was the book that told me Buddhism might be my religion.

Most of all, this book holds out the hope that practice can be integrated into anyone's life, no matter how bleeped up it is.

2. The Eight Gates of Zen, by John Daido Loori, Roshi

Eight Gates of Zen

This book is as close as you're going to get to a nuts-and-bolts explanation of formal Zen training. It's wonderfully clear and keeps Zenspeak to a minimum, yet there's depth to it as well.

I recommend this book in particular to people in the "why do I need a Zen teacher to do Zen?" phase. Of course, you don't need a Zen teacher. You don't need to brush your teeth or tie your shoes, either, unless you want to keep your teeth or not trip over your shoelaces. It's up to you.

This book explains zazen, the Zen teacher-student relationship, Zen literature, Zen ritual, Buddhist morality, Zen arts (including martial arts) and how all of these tie into the everyday life of a Zen student, in or out of a monastery.

3. Taking the Path of Zen, by Robert Aitken, Roshi

Taking the Path of Zen

Robert Aitken is one of my favorite Zen teacher-writers. His explanations of even the most vexatious koan can be wonderfully accessible.

Taking the Path of Zen covers much of the same territory as Daido Roshi's Eight Gates of Zen. The difference is that Aitken's book might be better for someone who's already got a foot in the door at a Zen center. In the Preface, the author says "My purpose in this book is to provide a manual that may be used, chapter by chapter, as a program of instruction over the first few weeks of Zen training." It does, however, provide a nice preview of what the first few weeks of Zen training are like.

4. Other Books Not for Beginners

Nearly all "beginner" Zen book lists contain some books that I'm not putting on this list, for various reasons.

The first is Shunryu Suzuki's Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind. It is a wonderful book, but in spite of the title it is not a good book for beginners. Sit one or two sesshins first, and then read it.

I am ambivalent about Philip Kapleau's Three Pillars of Zen. It's very good, but it gives the impression, I think, that the koan Mu is the be-all and end-all of Zen, which is very much not the case.

Alan Watts was a great writer, but his writings on Zen don't always reflect a clear understanding of Zen. If you want to read Watts's books on Zen for fun and inspiration that's fine, but don't read him as an authority on Zen.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, 26 September 2013

Buddhism: Further Complaints About "Buddhist Violence" Charges

Buddhism
Get the latest headlines from the Buddhism GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com 
Complimentary Downloads

7 Days of Complimentary Downloads: 100,000+ Motion Backgrounds, Video Clips, Production Music Tracks, Sound Effects, Special Effects and More.
From our sponsors
Further Complaints About "Buddhist Violence" Charges
Sep 26th 2013, 14:48

A rare thing has happened, which is that Michael Jerryson wrote something I agree with. In "Navy Yard Shooting: Why It's Not a Religion Story," he points out that in other recent mass shootings in which the perpetrator was Christian, the shooter's religion wasn't played up as part of the story. In most of these recent acts of mass violence, what the shooters had in common was a history of mental instability, possibly psychosis. Slapping a "religious violence" label on these shootings is inaccurate and misleading, Jerryson says, whether the shooter is Christian or Buddhist. I agree.

As I've written over the past couple of posts, all kinds of bad actions are labeled "religious violence" that, arguably, are not. Or only partly.

What is religious violence? If you can find sacred scripture that advocates or condones violence (and I sincerely don't believe this applies to Buddhism), yes, that would be religious violence. If religious institutions advocate or take part in violence, even in violation of their tradition's teaching, yes, that would be religious violence. You can find examples of such violence in Buddhist history.

Let's say an authentically ordained clergyperson, a member in good standing of some religious institution, advocates or commits violence on behalf of his religion. Let's assume he is not psychotic and believes he is doing the right thing, even if it violates his religion's teachings, and even if he's acting on his own without support from his superiors. This may be what's going on with a few Buddhist monks in Burma, calling for violence against Muslims. I won't argue with calling this "Buddhist violence," especially if other Buddhist authorities in Burma don't take a firm stand against it. However ...

Let's try another scenario. What if, say, someone with no Zen training and no Zen credentials suddenly decided to promote himself as a "Zen master" (this has happened). He writes some books that claim to be about Buddhism but are really a mashup of Vedanta, New Age, and some stuff he thought up in the shower. He has no association with any Buddhist lineage or institution, but he's got a good sales pitch, and he gains a devoted following of people who assume he is what he says he is (again, this has happened).

Now, let's say our hypothetical phony Zen master murders someone. Is that "Buddhist violence"? I can just about guarantee that someone would call it that. But if he's entirely untethered from any Buddhist tradition, lineage, or institution, and his teachings only look sorta kinda Buddhist from a distance, but aren't really Buddhist, then I say it isn't.

By the same token, as I wrote in an old post about an alleged act of Buddhist violence --

These were some political assassinations carried out in Japan in the 1930s by a group headed by a Nisshō Inoue. Inoue called himself a priest of the Nichiren school, but he was never ordained, and as far as I know no school of Nichiren Buddhism in Japan claimed him as its own. He was a fake, in other words. So why is what he did "Buddhist terrorism" and not "some charismatic psychopath pretending to be a priest terrorism"?

Michael Jerryson elsewhere has listed the 1995 sarin gas attacks in the Tokyo subways as "Buddhist violence" because they were carried out by an allegedly Buddhist organization, Aum Shinrikyo. But according to what information I could glean from the web, Aum Shinrikyo was focused largely on the prophesy of Armageddon taken from the Christian Book of Revelations. It was actually a new religion that blended some of the more feverish elements of Christianity with current popular culture, yoga, and some Buddhist and Shinto iconography. The founder, Shoko Asahara, was not ordained and had no affiliation with any established Buddhist institution in Japan.

But apparently Asahara mentioned the Lotus Sutra in an interview, which to Jerryson qualifies the sarin gas attack as official "Buddhist violence," even thought there is nothing in the Lotus Sutra that would even remotely justify the sarin gas attack.

Bad things do happen when charismatic psychopaths set themselves up as religious leaders. For example, in 1978, an ordained Christian minister (in both Assemblies of God and Disciples of Christ, I believe)  named Jim Jones had five visitors to his Guyana compound murdered, and then ordered his own followers, more than 900 people, to commit suicide.

Was that "Christian violence"? Or was it a kind of group psychological pathology that expresses itself as religion, but that can't really be blamed on Christianity?

Most Christians probably would argue the latter is closer to the truth. By most accounts, in the final years of his "ministry" Jones's preachings had little to do with the teachings of Jesus. Certainly those final violent actions were about Jones's authority as a cult leader. He was being challenged, and it appears that rather than risk loss of his status he chose to die -- and to take his followers with him.

By the same token, both Stephen Prothero and Michael Jerryson have, at one time or another, pointed to a 6th century Chinese monk named Faqing as a perpetrator of Buddhist violence. Faqing proclaimed himself to be Maitreya , raised an army, and attacked monasteries that didn't recognize him as the future Buddha. He had his followers take narcotics and told them that if they killed ten enemies they would become bodhisattvas. I say the story of Faqing has "charismatic psychopath" written all over it. He's a Chinese equivalent of Jim Jones, and like Jones, had gone so far off the reservation that nothing he did could justifiably to attributed to his earlier religious affiliation.

So now that Michael Jerryson has said something sensible, maybe he will re-think his earlier judgments on what constitutes "Buddhist violence" and what doesn't.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions