Friday, 30 November 2012

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Dragons!

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Dragons!
Nov 30th 2012, 11:10

Buddhism came to China from India almost two millennia ago. As Buddhism spread in China, it adapted to Chinese culture. Monks stopped wearing the traditional saffron robes and adopted Chinese-style robes, for example. And in China, Buddhism met dragons.

Dragons have been part of Chinese culture for at least 7,000 years. In China, dragons have long symbolized power, creativity, heaven, and good fortune. They are thought to have authority over bodies of water, rain, floods and storms.

In time, Chinese Buddhist artists adopted the dragon as a symbol of enlightenment. Today dragons decorate roofs and gates of temples, both as guardians and to symbolize the dragon's power of clarity. Buddhist dragons often are depicted holding a mani jewel, which represents the Buddha's teaching.

Dragons in Chan (Zen) Literature

In the 6th century, Chan (Zen) emerged in China as a distinctive school of Buddhism. Chan was nurtured in Chinese culture, and dragons make frequent appearances in Chan literature. The dragon plays many roles -- as a symbol of enlightenment and also as a symbol for ourselves. For example, "meeting the dragon in the cave" is a metaphor for confronting one's own deepest fears and obstacles.

And then there's the Chinese folk tale of the "true dragon," adopted as a parable by countless teachers. Here's the story:

Yeh Kung-tzu was a man who loved dragons. He studied dragon lore and decorated his home with paintings and statues of dragons. He would talk on and on about dragons to anyone who would listen.

One day a dragon heard about Yeh Kung-tzu and thought, how lovely that this man appreciates us. It would surely make him happy to meet a true dragon.

The kindly dragon flew to Yeh Kung-tzu's house and went inside, to find Yeh Kung-tzu asleep. Then Yeh Kung-tzu woke up and saw the dragon coiled by his bed, its scales and teeth glittering in the moonlight. And Yeh Kung-tzu screamed in terror.

Before the dragon could introduce himself, Yeh Kung-tzu grabbed a sword and lunged at the dragon. The dragon flew away.

Many generations of Chan and Zen teachers, including Dogen, have mentioned the true dragon story in their teachings. For example, Dogen wrote in Funkanzazengi, "I beseech you, noble friends in learning through experience, do not become so accustomed to images that you are dismayed by the true dragon."

As allegory, the story can be interpreted many ways. It could be an allegory for someone who has an intellectual interest in Buddhism, and reads lots of books about it, but who doesn't feel a need to practice, find a teacher or take the refuges. Such a person prefers a kind of faux Buddhism to the real thing. Or, it might refer to being afraid to let go of self-clinging in order to realize enlightenment.

Nagas and Dragons

Nagas are snake-like creatures that appear in the Pali Canon. They are sometimes identified as dragons, but they have a slightly different origin.

Naga is the Sanskrit word for cobra. In ancient Indian art, nagas are depicted as human from the waist up and snakes from the waist down. They also sometimes appear as giant cobras. In some Hindu and Buddhist literature they can change appearance from human to snake.

In The Mahabharata, a Hindu epic poem, nagas are depicted as mostly villainous creatures bent on harming others. In the poem, the enemy of nagas is the great eagle-king Garuda.

In the Pali Canon nagas are treated more sympathetically, but they remain eternally at war with garudas, except for a brief truce negotiated by the Buddha. In time, nagas came to be depicted as guardians of Mount Meru and also of the Buddha. Nagas play an important role in Mahayana mythology as protectors of the sutras. You may find pictures of the Buddha or other sages sitting under the canopy of a great cobra's hood; this would be a naga.

As Buddhism spread through China and on to Japan and Korea, nagas came to be identified as a kind of dragon. Some stories told in China and Japan about dragons originated as stories about nagas.

In Tibetan Buddhist mythology, however, dragons and nagas are distinctively different creatures. In Tibet, nagas usually are nasty water-dwelling spirits that cause disease and misfortune. But Tibetan dragons are protectors of Buddhism whose thunderous voices awaken us from delusion.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Beginner Zen Books

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Beginner Zen Books
Nov 30th 2012, 11:10

There are truckloads of books about Zen, but many assume the reader already knows something about Zen. And, unfortunately, many other were written by people who don't know something about Zen. If you are a genuine beginner and don't know a zabuton from zucchini, here are some books for you.

1. The Miracle of Mindfulness, by Thich Nhat Hanh

The Miracle of Mindfulness

Strictly speaking, this little book by the Vietnamese Zen master Thich Nhat Hanh is not about Zen. It's more of an introduction to mindfulness and Mahayana. But in the West, this seems to be the book that everyone reads before they show up at the Zen center.

I read a review of A Miracle of Mindfulness that said it was not about Buddhism. It is; it's just written in such a way that non-Buddhist readers might not recognize that it's about Buddhism. Certainly it's a book that can be appreciated by non-Buddhists. But for me, it was the book that told me Buddhism might be my religion.

Most of all, this book holds out the hope that practice can be integrated into anyone's life, no matter how bleeped up it is.

2. The Eight Gates of Zen, by John Daido Loori, Roshi

Eight Gates of Zen

This book is as close as you're going to get to a nuts-and-bolts explanation of formal Zen training. It's wonderfully clear and keeps Zenspeak to a minimum, yet there's depth to it as well.

I recommend this book in particular to people in the "why do I need a Zen teacher to do Zen?" phase. Of course, you don't need a Zen teacher. You don't need to brush your teeth or tie your shoes, either, unless you want to keep your teeth or not trip over your shoelaces. It's up to you.

This book explains zazen, the Zen teacher-student relationship, Zen literature, Zen ritual, Buddhist morality, Zen arts (including martial arts) and how all of these tie into the everyday life of a Zen student, in or out of a monastery.

3. Taking the Path of Zen, by Robert Aitken, Roshi

Taking the Path of Zen

Robert Aitken is one of my favorite Zen teacher-writers. His explanations of even the most vexatious koan can be wonderfully accessible.

Taking the Path of Zen covers much of the same territory as Daido Roshi's Eight Gates of Zen. The difference is that Aitken's book might be better for someone who's already got a foot in the door at a Zen center. In the Preface, the author says "My purpose in this book is to provide a manual that may be used, chapter by chapter, as a program of instruction over the first few weeks of Zen training." It does, however, provide a nice preview of what the first few weeks of Zen training are like.

4. Other Books Not for Beginners

Nearly all "beginner" Zen book lists contain some books that I'm not putting on this list, for various reasons.

The first is Shunryu Suzuki's Zen Mind, Beginner's Mind. It is a wonderful book, but in spite of the title it is not a good book for beginners. Sit one or two sesshins first, and then read it.

I am ambivalent about Philip Kapleau's Three Pillars of Zen. It's very good, but it gives the impression, I think, that the koan Mu is the be-all and end-all of Zen, which is very much not the case.

Alan Watts was a great writer, but his writings on Zen don't always reflect a clear understanding of Zen. If you want to read Watts's books on Zen for fun and inspiration that's fine, but don't read him as an authority on Zen.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Origins of Mahayana

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Origins of Mahayana
Nov 30th 2012, 11:10

The precise origins of Mahayana Buddhism are something of a mystery. The historical record shows it emerging as a separate school from Theravada during the 1st century BCE. However, it most likely had been developing gradually for a long time before that.

Some scholars have suggested that Mahayana is an offspring of Mahasanghika, a now-extinct Buddhist sect formed about 320 BCE. Mahasanghika developed the idea of the transcendent nature of a Buddha, the ideal of the bodhisattva, and the doctrine of shunyata, or "emptiness."

A Gradual Beginning

However the two schools originated, it's fair to say that both Theravada and Mahayana developed from the earliest schools of Buddhism. Historian Heinrich Dumoulin wrote that "Traces of Mahayana teachings appear already in the oldest Buddhist scriptures. Contemporary scholarship is inclined to view the transition of Mahayana as a gradual process hardly noticed by people at the time." [Dumoulin, Zen Buddhism: A History, Vol. 1, India and China (Macmillan, 1994), p. 28]

Some time in the 1st century BCE, the name Mahayana, or "great vehicle," was established to distinguish this divergent school from Theravada. Theravada was derided as "Hinayana," or the "lesser vehicle." The names point to the distinction between Theravada's emphasis on individual enlightenment and the Mahayana ideal of the enlightenment of all beings. The name "Hinayana" is generally considered to be a pejorative.

Over the years, Mahayana subdivided into more schools with divergent practices and doctrines. These spread from India to China and Tibet, then to Korea and Japan. Today Mahayana is the dominant form of Buddhism in those countries.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Impermanence

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Impermanence
Nov 30th 2012, 11:10

All compounded things are impermanent. The historical Buddha taught this, over and over. These words were among the last he ever spoke.

"Compounded things" are, of course, any thing that can't be divided into parts. I understand that science tells us even the most basic "parts," chemical elements, degrade over vast periods of time.

Most of us think the impermanence of all things is an unpleasant fact we'd rather ignore. We look at the world around us, and most of it seems solid and fixed. We tend to stay in places we find comfortable and safe, and we don't want them to change. We also think we are permanent, the same person continuing from birth to death, and maybe beyond that.

In other words, we may know, intellectually, that things are impermanent, but we don't perceive things that way. And that's a problem.

Impermanence and the Four Noble Truths

In his first sermon after his enlightenment, the Buddha laid out a proposition -- the Four Noble Truths. He said that life is dukkha, a word that cannot be precisely translated into English, but is sometimes rendered "stressful," "unsatisfactory," or "suffering." Very basically, life is full of craving or "thirst" that is never satisfied. This thirst comes from ignorance of the true nature of reality.

We see ourselves as permanent beings, separate from everything else. This is the primordial ignorance and the first of the three poisons out of which arise the other two poisons, greed and hate. We go through life attaching to things, wanting them to last forever. But they don't last, and this makes us sad. We experience envy and anger and even become violent with others because we cling to a false perception of permanence.

The realization of wisdom is that this separation is an illusion, because permanence is an illusion. Even the "I" we think is so permanent is an illusion. If you are new to Buddhism, at first this may not make much sense. The idea that perceiving impermanence is the key to happiness also doesn't make much sense. It's not something that can be understood by intellect alone.

However, the Fourth Noble Truth is that through practice of the Eightfold Path we may realize and experience the truth of impermanence and be freed of the pernicious effects of the three poisons. When it's perceived that the causes of hate and greed are illusions, hate and greed -- and the misery they cause -- disappear.

Impermanence and Anatta

The Buddha taught that existence has three marks -- dukkha, anicca (impermanence), and anatta (egolessness). Anatta is also sometimes translated as "without essence" or "no self." This is the teaching that what we think of as "me," who was born one day and will die another day, is an illusion.

Yes, you are here, reading this article. But the "I" you think is permanent is really a series of thought-moments, an illusion continually generated by our bodies and senses and nervous systems. There is no permanent, fixed "me" that has always inhabited your ever-changing body.

In some schools of Buddhism, the doctrine of anatta is taken further, to the teaching of shunyata, or "emptiness." This teaching stresses that there is no intrinsic self or "thing" within a compilation of component parts, whether we are talking about a person or a car or a flower. This is an extremely difficult doctrine for most of us, so don't feel bad if this makes no sense at all. It takes time. For a little more explanation, see the Introduction to the Heart Sutra.

Impermanence and Attachment

"

The act of attaching requires two things -- an attacher, and an object of attachment. "Attachment," then, is a natural by-product of ignorance. Because we see ourselves as a permanent thing separate from everything else, we grasp and cling to "other" things. Attachment in this sense might be defined as any mental habit that perpetuates the illusion of a permanent, separate self.

The most damaging attachment is ego attachment. Whatever we think we need to "be ourselves," whether a job title, a lifestyle, or a belief system, is an attachment. We cling to these things are are devastated when we lose them.

On top of that, we go through life wearing emotional armor to protect our egos, and that emotional armor closes us off from each other. So, in this sense, attachment comes from the illusion of a permanent, separate self, and non-attachment comes from the realization that nothing is separate.

Impermanence and Renunciation

"

Impermanence and Change

The seemingly fixed and solid world you see around you actually is in a state of flux. Our senses may not be able to detect moment-t0-moment change, but everything is always changing. When we fully appreciate this, we can fully appreciate our experiences without clinging to them. We can also learn to let go of old fears, disappointments, regrets. Nothing is real but this moment.

Because nothing is permanent, everything is possible. Liberation is possible. Enlightenment is possible.

Thich Nhat Hanh wrote,

"We have to nourish our insight into impermanence every day. If we do, we will live more deeply, suffer less, and enjoy life much more. Living deeply, we will touch the foundation of reality, nirvana, the world of no-birth and no-death. Touching impermanence deeply, we touch the world beyond permanence and impermanence. We touch the ground of being and see that which we have called being and nonbeing are just notions. Nothing is ever lost. Nothing is ever gained." [The Heart of the Buddha's Teaching (Parallax Press 1998), p. 124]

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Sunyata

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Sunyata
Nov 30th 2012, 11:10

Definition:

According to the Mahayana teaching of sunyata, beings and things have no intrinsic existence in themselves. All phenomena come into being because of conditions created by other phenomena. Thus, they have no existence of their own and are empty of a permanent self. There is neither reality not not-reality; only relativity.

This emptiness is not nihilistic. All phenomena are void of self-essence, but it is incorrect to say that phenomena exist or don’t exist. Form and appearance create the world of myriad things, but the myriad things have identity only in relation to each other. Beyond identity, shunyata is an absolute reality that is all things and beings, unmanifested.

Also Known As: Emptiness

Alternate Spellings: Sunyata

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Thursday, 29 November 2012

Buddhism: The Further Meaning of the Diamond Sutra

Buddhism
Get the latest headlines from the Buddhism GuideSite. // via fulltextrssfeed.com
The Further Meaning of the Diamond Sutra
Nov 29th 2012, 10:42

Continuing my complaint that people keep assuming the Diamond Sutra is mostly about impermanence, when it isn't -- I started to write a blog post, but it got long enough I turned it into an article. So here is "The Deeper Meaning of the Diamond Sutra: It's Not About Impermanence." Those of you who express puzzlement when I say the sutra is not about impermanence, please read. You can leave comments here.

Now, I do not even pretend that I thoroughly understand the sutra myself, or that anything I say about it is the last word. I doubt there will ever be a last word. This is a deep and subtle text that takes a long time to sink into. But what I do perceive tells me plainly that if you think the sutra is just about impermanence, you haven't seen its meaning at all.

Beyond my argument, I suggest that people try a simple exercise. One, completely clear your mind of any assumptions about what the sutra is about. Two, Assume that the sutra actually ends just before the "bubble in a stream" verse -- which it may actually have, originally, according to some scholars. Now, read it. What do you see?

Not much about impermanence, I suspect. Now, you may not grasp what is being said in the sutra, which is understandable. This is a steep sutra. But I don't see how anyone could read this sutra without putting it through a pre-constructed "impermanence" filter and still say it is mostly about impermanence.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddhist Holidays

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Buddhist Holidays
Nov 29th 2012, 11:10

Hungry ghost festivals traditionally are held in China on the 15th day of the 7th lunar month. Hungry ghosts are insatiably hungry creatures born into a miserable existence because of their greed.

According to Chinese folklore, the unhappy dead walk among the living throughout the month and must be placated with food, incense, fake paper money, and even cars and homes, also paper and burned as offerings. This is also a traditional time to honor the memories of departed loved ones, unhappy or not.

The man in the photograph is placing a floating candle on Shichahai Lake in Beijing, China, to pay respects to deceased ancestors.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Dalai Lama, God-King?

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Dalai Lama, God-King?
Nov 29th 2012, 11:10

His Holiness the Dalai Lama is often referred to as a "God-King" by western media. Westerners are told that the several Dalai Lamas who ruled Tibet for centuries were reincarnations not only of each other but also of the Tibetan God of Compassion, Chenrezig.

Westerners with some knowledge of Buddhism find these Tibetan beliefs baffling. First, Buddhism elsewhere in Asia is "nontheistic," meaning it is not dependent upon belief in gods. Second, Buddhism teaches that nothing has an inherent self. So how can anyone, god or human, be "reincarnated"?

Buddhism and Reincarnation

Reincarnation usually is defined as "rebirth of the soul or some part of oneself in another body." But Buddhism is based on the doctrine of anatman, also called anatta, which denies the existence of a soul or permanent, individual self. See "What Is the Self?" for a more detailed explanation.

If there is no soul or permanent, individual self, how can anyone be reincarnated? And the answer is that no one can be reincarnated as the word is normally understood by Westerners. Buddhism teaches there is rebirth, but it is not the distinct individual who is reborn. See "Karma and rebirth" for more discussion.

"Powers and Forces"

Centuries ago, as Buddhism spread through Asia, pre-Buddhist beliefs in local gods often found a way into local Buddhist institutions. This is particularly true of Tibet. Vast populations of mythical characters from the pre-Buddhist Bon religion live on in Tibetan Buddhist iconography.

Have Tibetans abandoned the teaching of Anatman? Not exactly. As Mike Wilson explains in this very insightful essay, " Schisms, murder, and hungry ghosts in Shangra-La - internal conflicts in Tibetan Buddhist sect," the Tibetans consider all phenomena to be creations of mind. This is a teaching based on a philosophy called Yogacara, and it is found in many schools of Mahayana Buddhism, not just Tibetan Buddhism.

The Tibetans reason that if people and other phenomena are creations of mind, and gods and demons are also creations of mind, then the gods and demons are no more or less real than fish, birds and people. Mike Wilson explains, "Tibetan Buddhists to the present day pray to gods and utilize oracles, just like the Bon, and believe the unseen world is populated with all sorts of powers and forces that must be reckoned with, even though they are phenomena of mind without an inherent self."

Bon and Buddhism

As Mike Wilson documents in his article, throughout the history of Tibetan Buddhism there has been a conflict between what one might call "standard" Buddhism and Bon-influenced Buddhism. There is evidence of sectarian murders in Tibetan Buddhist history - three as recently as 1997 -- as a result of the Bon-versus-Buddhism tension.

Less-Than-Godlike Power

This takes us to the practical question of how much power the ruling Dalai Lamas actually had before the Chinese invaded in 1950. Although in theory the Dalai Lama had godlike authority, in practice he had to finesse sectarian rivalries and conflicts with the wealthy and influential like any other politician. There is evidence a few Dalai Lamas - the 4th and 9th in particular - were assassinated by sectarian enemies.

Everyone's a God. No One's a God.

If the Dalai Lama is the reincarnation or rebirth or manifestation of a god, would that not make him more than human in the eyes of Tibetans? That depends on how the word "god" is understood and applied. That understanding may vary, but I can speak only to a Buddhist perspective.

Tibetan Buddhism makes much use of tantra yoga, which includes a broad range of rituals and practices. On its most basic level, tantra yoga in Buddhism is about deity identification. Through meditation, chanting and other practices the tantricka internalizes the divine and becomes the deity, or, at least, manifests what the deity represents.

For example, tantra practice with a god of compassion would awaken compassion in the tantricka. In this case, it might be more accurate to think of the various deities as something like Jungian archetypes rather than actual beings.

Further, in Mahayana Buddhism all beings are reflections or aspects of all other beings and all beings are fundamentally Buddha-nature. Put another way, we're all each other -- gods, buddhas, beings.

How the Dalai Lama Became Ruler of Tibet

There are four main schools of Tibetan Buddhism - Nyingma, Kagyu, Sakya and Gelug. The Dalai Lama is head of only one of these, the Gelug school. These schools have further sub-divided into many sects within Tibetan Buddhism.

The Gelug school did not always dominate the others. It was the 5th Dalai Lama, Lobsang Gyatso (1617-1682), who first became ruler of all Tibet. The "Great Fifth" formed a military alliance with the Mongol leader Gushri Khan. When two other Mongol chiefs and the ruler of Kang, an ancient kingdom of central Asia, invaded Tibet, Gushri Khan routed them and declared himself king of Tibet. Then Gushri Khan recognized the fifth Dalai Lama as the spiritual and temporal leader of Tibet.

See "How Buddhism Came to Tibet" for more background on the history of Tibetan Buddhism. See "Behind the Turmoil in Tibet" for more on events leading up to the exile of the current Dalai Lama, the 14th.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Who Is the Dalai Lama?

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Who Is the Dalai Lama?
Nov 29th 2012, 11:10

His Holiness the Dalai Lama has one of the most famous faces in the world, so familiar he seems to be everyone's genial great-uncle. Yet journalists call him a "god" (he says he isn't) or a "living Buddha" (he says he isn't that, either). In some circles he is respected for his scholarship. In other circles he is ridiculed as a dim bulb. He is a Nobel Peace Prize Laureate who inspires millions, yet he is also demonized as a tyrant who incites violence.

Just who is the Dalai Lama, anyway?

In his book, Why the Dalai Lama Matters (Atria Books, 2008), scholar and former Tibetan monk Robert Thurman devotes 32 pages to answering the question, "Who is the Dalai Lama?" Thurman explains that the role of Dalai Lama embodies many layers that can be understood psychologically, physically, mythologically, historically, culturally, doctrinally and spiritually. In short, it is not a simple question to answer.

In brief, the Dalai Lama is the highest-ranking lama (spiritual master) of Tibetan Buddhism. Since the 17th century, the Dalai Lama has been the political and spiritual leader of Tibet. He also is considered an emanation of the Bodhisattva Avalokiteshvara, an iconic figure who represents boundless compassion. Avalokiteshvara, Robert Thurman writes, turns up time and time again in Tibet's creation and history myths as a father and savior of the Tibetan people.

Each Dalai Lama is recognized as the reincarnation of the previous Dalai Lama. This does not mean, however, that a Dalai Lama soul has transmigrated from one body to another through the centuries. Buddhists, including Tibetan Buddhists, understand that an individual has no intrinsic self, or soul, to transmigrate. It's a bit closer to a Buddhist understanding to say that the great compassion and dedicated vows of each Dalai Lama causes the next one to be born. The new Dalai Lama is not the same person as the previous one, but neither is he a different person.

For more on the role of the Dalai Lama in Tibetan Buddhism, see "What's a 'God-King'?"

Tenzin Gyatso

The current Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, is the 14th. He was born in 1935, two years after the death of the 13th Dalai Lama. When he was three years old, signs and visions led senior monks to find the little boy, living with his farming family in northeastern Tibet, and declare him to be the 14th Dalai Lama. He began his monastic training at the age of six. He was called upon to assume the full responsibilities of the Dalai Lama in 1950, when he was only 15, after the Chinese had invaded Tibet.

The Exile Begins

For nine years, the young Dalai Lama tried to prevent a total Chinese takeover of Tibet, negotiating with the Chinese and urging Tibetans to avoid violent retaliation against Chinese troops. His tenuous position unraveled quickly in March 1959.

The Chinese military commander in Lhasa, General Chiang Chin-wu, invited the Dalai Lama to view some entertainment in the Chinese military barracks. But there was a condition -- His Holiness could bring no soldiers or armed bodyguards with him. Fearing an assassination, on March 10, 1959, an estimated 300,000 Tibetans formed a human shield around the Dalai Lama's summer residence, Norbulingka Palace. By March 12 Tibetans also were barricading the streets of Lhasa. Chinese and Tibetan troops squared off, preparing to do battle. By March 15, the Chinese had positioned artillery in range of Norbulingka, and His Holiness agreed to evacuate the palace.

Two days later, artillery shells struck the palace. Heeding the advice of the Nechung Oracle, His Holiness the Dalai Lama began his journey into exile. Dressed as a common soldier and accompanied by a few ministers, the Dalai Lama left Lhasa and began a three-week trek toward India and freedom.

See also "The Tibetan Uprising of 1959" by Kallie Szczepanski, the Guide to Asian History.

Challenges of Exile

The Tibetan people for centuries had lived in relative isolation from the rest of the world, developing a unique culture and distinctive schools of Buddhism. Suddenly the isolation was ruptured, and exiled Tibetans, Tibetan culture and Tibetan Buddhism tumbled out and quickly scattered around the world.

His Holiness, still in his 20s when his exile began, faced several crises at once.

As the deposed Tibetan head of state, it was his responsibility to speak for the people of Tibet and do what he could to lessen their oppression. He also had to consider the welfare of the tens of thousands of Tibetans who followed him into exile, often with nothing but what they wore.

Reports came from Tibet that Tibetan culture was being stifled. Over the next several years millions of ethnic Chinese would immigrate to Tibet, making the Tibetans an ethnic minority in their own country. Tibetan language, culture and identity were marginalized.

Tibetan Buddhism also was exiled; high lamas of the four major schools left Tibet, also, and established new monasteries in Nepal and India. Before long Tibetan monasteries, schools and dharma centers spread into Europe and the Americas as well. Tibetan Buddhism for centuries had been geographically confined and functioned with a hierarchy that had developed over centuries. Could it maintain its integrity after being dispersed so quickly?

Dealing With China

Early in his exile, His Holiness appealed to the United Nations for help for Tibet. The General Assembly adopted three resolutions, in 1959, 1961, and 1965, that called on China to respect the human rights of Tibetans. These were no solution.

His Holiness has made countless attempts to gain some autonomy for Tibet while avoiding all-out warfare with China. He has tried to steer a middle way in which Tibet would remain a territory of China but with a status similar to that of Hong Kong -- largely self-governing, with its own legal and political systems. More recently he has said he is willing to allow Tibet to have a Communist government, but he still calls for "meaningful" autonomy. China simply demonizes him and will not negotiate in good faith.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Historic Temples of Japan: Ryoanji

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Historic Temples of Japan: Ryoanji
Nov 29th 2012, 11:10

The Rinzai Zen temple Ryoanji -- Temple of the Peaceful Dragon -- was built in Kyoto in the late 1400s, and the garden may be nearly as old. Its fifteen moss-covered boulders are placed so that, viewed from any point, only fourteen of the boulders are visible. Tradition says only the enlightened see all fifteen boulders.

The garden invites us to contemplate imperfection and limitation. We may know there are fifteen stones, yet in the imperfect world we do not see them all. In this way, the garden becomes a visual koan.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Rohatsu

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Rohatsu
Nov 29th 2012, 11:10

Definition:

Rohatsu is Japanese for "eighth day of the twelfth month." December 8 has come to be the day Japanese Buddhists observe the enlightenment of the historical Buddha.

In Japanese Zen monasteries, Rohatsu is the last day of a week-long sesshin. A sesshin is an intensive meditation retreat in which all of one's waking time is dedicated to meditation. Even when not in the meditation hall, participants endeavor to maintain meditation focus at all times -- eating, washing, doing chores. Silence is maintained unless speaking is absolutely necessary.

In a Rohatsu Sesshin, it is traditional for each evening's meditation period to be longer than the previous evening's. On the last night, those with enough stamina sit in meditation through the night.

The Buddha's enlightenment is observed at different times in other parts of Asia. For example, Theravada Buddhists of southeast Asia commemorate the Buddha's birth, enlightenment and passing into Nirvana at death on the same day, called Vesak Puja, which is usually in May. Tibetan Buddhists also observe these three events in the life of the Buddha at the same time, during Saga Dawa Duchen, which usually is in June.

Also Known As: Bodhi Day

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Wednesday, 28 November 2012

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Buddhist Sciptures Overview

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Buddhist Sciptures Overview
Nov 28th 2012, 11:10

Is there a Buddhist Bible? Not exactly. Buddhism has a vast number of scriptures, but no one text is accepted as authentic and authoritative by every school of Buddhism. Instead, each school of Buddhism has its own ideas about which scriptures are important.

There is one other reason that there is no Buddhist Bible. Many religions consider their scriptures to be the revealed word of God or gods. In Buddhism, however, it is understood that the scriptures are teachings of the historical Buddha -- a human being -- or other enlightened masters.

The teachings in Buddhist scriptures are directions for practice, or how to realize enlightenment for oneself. What's important is to understand and practice what the texts are teaching, not just "believe in" them.

Types of Buddhist Scripture

Many scriptures are called "sutras" in Sanskrit or "sutta" in Pali. The word sutra or sutta means "thread." The word "sutra" in the title of a text indicates the work is a sermon of the Buddha or one of his major disciples. However, as I will explain later, many sutras probably have other origins.

Sutras come in many sizes. Some are book length, some are only a few lines. No one seems willing to guess how many sutras there might be if you piled every individual one from every canon and collection into a pile. A lot.

Not all scriptures are sutras. For example, the rules of the monastic orders are recorded in a text called the Vinaya-pitaka. There is also a text called the Abhidharma (Sanskrit) or Abhidhamma (Pali), of which there is more than one version. The Abhidharma is a work of analysis or philosophy rather than a sermon, so it isn't called a "sutra."

Theravada and Mahayana Canons

About two millennia ago, Buddhism split into two major schools, called today Theravada and Mahayana. Buddhist scriptures are associated with one or the other, divided into Theravada and Mahayana canons.

Theravadins do not consider the Mahayana scriptures to be authentic. Mahayana Buddhists on the whole consider the Theravada canon to be authentic, but in some cases Mahayana Buddhists think some of their scriptures have superseded the Theravada canon in authority.

To add to the confusion, schools of Mahayana Buddhism have different views about which Mahayana scriptures are authentic and authoritative. Some Mahayana scriptures are important to some schools and ignored by others. For example, the Lotus Sutra is the only scripture accepted by the Nichiren school, but it plays no part in Tibetan Buddhism.

Theravada Buddhist Scriptures

The scriptures of the Theravada school are collected in a work called the Tipitaka (or Tripitaka in Sanskrit). The Pali word Tipitaka means "three baskets," which indicates the Tipitaka is divided into three parts, and each part is a collection of works. The three sections are the basket of sutras (Sutra-pitaka), the basket of discipline (Vinaya-pitaka), and the basket of special teachings (Abhidharma-pitaka).

As I mentioned earlier in this article, the Vinaya gives the rules for the orders of nuns and monks, and the Abdhidharma provides analysis of the sutras but is not a sutra (sermon) itself.

The most complete and most common version of the Tipitaka is in the Pali language. This Pali Tipitaka, also called the Pali Canon, contains the scriptures followed by Theravada Buddhism. The Pali Canon is thought to be the words of the historical Buddha and some of his disciples, preserved for a time by oral tradition and then written down in the 1st century BCE. For a more complete explanation of the origins of the Tipitaka, please see "The Pali Canon: The First Buddhist Scriptures."

There are ancient versions of parts of the Tipitaka in other languages. For example, there are sutras in Sanskrit that correspond to some of the sutras in the Pali Sutra-pitaka, and the collection of these early discourses is called the Agamas.

There also have been versions of the Abhidharma that are considerably different from the one in the Pali Canon. Some of these exist today only in fragments. But one, called the Sarvastivada Abhidharma, is still intact. Saravastivada was an early sect of Buddhism that emerged in the 3rd century BCE.

Mahayana Buddhist Scriptures

Although there are myths and stories that associate each of the Mahayana sutras to the historical Buddha, historians tell us the works were mostly written between the 1st century BCE and the 5th century CE, and a few even later than that. For the most part, the provenance and authorship of these texts are unknown.

The mysterious origins of these works give rise to questions about their authority. As I've said Theravada Buddhists disregard the Mahayana scriptures entirely. Among Mahayana Buddhist schools, some continue to associate the Mahayana sutras with the historical Buddha. Others acknowledge that these scriptures were written by unknown authors. But because the deep wisdom and spiritual value of these texts have been apparent to so many generations, they are preserved and revered as sutras anyway.

Many of the Mahyana sutras are thought to have been originally written in Sanskrit, but the oldest extant versions are Chinese translations, and the original Sanskrit is lost. Some scholars, however, argue that the first Chinese translations are, in fact, the original versions, and their authors claimed to have translated them from Sanskrit to give them more authority.

Within the Mahayana canon are many sub-canons. For example, the Prajnaparamita (perfection of wisdom) Sutra is a collection of about forty sutras, some very long, other very brief. The Heart Sutra is one of these. Because their central theme is prajna, wisdom, scholars sometimes call them the "wisdom literature."

Some Mahayana Sutras are unique to a particular school. For example, there are three "Pure Land" sutras that are the main scriptures of Pure Land Buddhism but which are not much used by other schools. Others, like the Lotus, are revered by several schools of Mahayana Buddhism but not all of them.

This list of major Mahayana Sutras is not comprehensive but provides brief explanations of the most important Mahayana sutras.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Hungry Ghosts

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Hungry Ghosts
Nov 28th 2012, 11:10

Definition:

"Hungry ghost" is one of the six modes of existence (see Six Realms). Hungry ghosts are pitiable creatures with huge, empty stomachs. They have pinhole mouths, and their necks are so thin they cannot swallow, so they remain hungry. Beings are reborn as hungry ghosts because of their greed, envy and jealousy. Hungry ghosts are also associated with addiction, obsession and compulsion.

The Sanskrit word for "hungry ghost" is "preta," which means "departed one."

Many schools of Buddhism leave food offerings on altars for hungry ghosts. In the summer there are hungry ghost festivals throughout Asia that feature food and entertainment for the hungry ghosts.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Karma

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Karma
Nov 28th 2012, 11:10

Definition:

Karma means "intentional action" and refers to the universal law of cause and effect. Karma is created not only by physical action but also by thoughts and words.

Just as action causes reaction, karma causes effects that come back to the original actor. Karma also tends to generate more karma that reaches out in all directions. We bear the consequences of the karma we create, but everyone around us is affected by our intentional acts as well, just as we are affected by theirs.

Buddhists do not think of karma as "destiny" or as some kind of cosmic retribution system. Although the fruits of "good" karma might be pleasant and beneficial, all karma keeps one entangled in the cycle of death and rebirth.

Actions free from desire, hate and delusion do not create karma. The enlightened being ceases to create karma and thus is liberated from rebirth.

Alternate Spellings: Kamma

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions

Buddhism: What's Hot Now: Early Buddhist History

Buddhism: What's Hot Now
These articles that had the largest increase in popularity over the last week // via fulltextrssfeed.com
Early Buddhist History
Nov 28th 2012, 11:10

Any history of Buddhism must begin with the life of the historical Buddha, who lived and taught in Nepal and India 25 centuries ago. This article is the next part of the history -- what happened to Buddhism after the Buddha's death, about 483 BCE.

This next chapter of Buddhist history begins with the Buddha's disciples. The Buddha had many lay followers, but most of his disciples were ordained monks and nuns. These monks and nuns did not live in monasteries. Instead, they were homeless, wandering through forests and villages, begging for food, sleeping under the trees. The only possessions monks were allowed to keep were three robes, one alms bowl, one razor, one needle, and one water strainer.

The robes had to be made from discarded cloth. It was a common practice to use spices such as turmeric and saffron to dye the cloth to make it more presentable -- and possibly smell better. To this day, Buddhist monks' robes are called "saffron robes" and are often (although not always) orange, the color of saffron.

Preserving the Teachings: The First Buddhist Council

When the Buddha died, the monk who became leader of the sangha was named Mahakashyapa. The early Pali texts tell us that, shortly after the Buddha's death, Mahakashyapa called a meeting of 500 monks to discuss what to do next. This meeting came to be called the First Buddhist Council.

The questions at hand were: How would the Buddha's teachings be preserved? And by what rules would the monks live? Monks recited and reviewed the Buddha's sermons and his rules for monks and nuns, and agreed which were authentic. (See "The Pali Canon: The First Buddhist Scriptures.")

According to historian Karen Armstrong (Buddha, 2001), about 50 years after the Buddha's death, monks in the eastern part of North India began to collect and order the texts in a more systematic way. The sermons and rules were not written down, but had been preserved by memorizing and reciting them. The Buddha's words were set in verse, and in lists, to make them easier to memorize. Then the texts were grouped into sections, and monks were assigned what part of the canon they would memorize for the future.

Sectarian Divisions: The Second Buddhist Council

By about a century after the Buddha's death, sectarian divisions were forming in the sangha. Some early texts refer to "eighteen schools," which did not appear to be markedly different from one another. Monks of different schools often lived and studied together.

The biggest rifts formed around questions of monastic discipline and authority. Among the distinctive factions were these two schools:

  • Sthaviravada. "Sthaviravada" is Sanskrit for "the Way of the Elders." The Sthaviavada school was conservative, adhering closely to the teachings and rules of the Pali Canon. The school lives today in parts of Asia by its Pali name, Theravada.
  • Mahasanghika. This school probably is a forerunner of Mahayana Buddhism. Mahasanghika developed the idea of the transcendent nature of a Buddha, the ideal of the bodhisattva, and the doctrine of shunyata, or "emptiness." This school advocated a somewhat more liberal approach to the monastic rules.

A Second Buddhist Council was called about 386 BCE in an attempt to unify the sangha, but sectarian fissures continued to form.

The Emperor Ashoka

Ashoka (ca. 304â€"232 BCE; sometimes spelled Asoka) was a warrior-prince of India known for his ruthlessness. According to legend he was first exposed to Buddhist teaching when some monks cared for him after he was wounded in battle. One of his wives, Devi, was a Buddhist. However, he was still a cruel and brutal conqueror until the day he walked into a city he had just conquered and saw the devastation. "What have I done?" he cried, and vowed to observe the Buddhist path for himself and for his kingdom.

Ashoka came to be the ruler of most of the Indian subcontinent. He erected pillars throughout his empire inscribed with the Buddha's teachings. According to legend, he opened seven of the original eight stupas of the Buddha, further divided the Buddha's relics, and erected 84,000 stupas in which to enshrine them. He was a tireless supporter of the monastic sangha and supported missions to spread the teachings beyond India, in particular into present-day Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Sri Lanka. Ashoka's patronage made Buddhism one of the major religions of Asia.

The Two Third Councils

By the time of Ashoka's reign the rift between Sthaviravada and Mahasanghika had grown large enough that the history of Buddhism splits into two very different versions of the Third Buddhist Council.

The Mahasanghika version of the Third Council was called to determine the nature of an Arhat. An arhat (Sanskrit) or arahant (Pali) is a person who has realized enlightenment and may enter Nirvana. In the Sthaviravada school, an arhat is the ideal of Buddhist practice.

A monk named Mahadeva proposed that an arhat is still subject to temptation, ignorance and doubt, and still benefits from teaching and practice. These propositions were adopted by the Mahasanghika school but rejected by Sthaviravada.

In the Sthaviravada version of history, the Third Buddhist Council was called by the Emperor Ashoka about 244 BCE to stop the spread of heresies. After this Council completed its work the monk Mahinda, thought to be a son of Ashoka, took the body of doctrine agreed upon by the Council into Sri Lanka, where it flourished. The Theravada school that exists today grew from this Sri Lankan lineage.

You are receiving this email because you subscribed to this feed at blogtrottr.com.

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, you can unsubscribe from this feed, or manage all your subscriptions